Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
By-Tor

Review of ROLEX 16613 Submariner two-tone "Noob factory" version

Recommended Posts

By-Tor

5LEf0pr.jpg

 

First three reps I purchased were TT Subs, back in early 2004 when I first came to the community. I have owned 2 "TW Best" models of this watch, and also one very old CN model from Joshua. Our family friend owns a genuine TT "Serti" Sub, which I have handled many times. So I guess I have some kind of insight to write about this replica. I never wrote a decent article of those old reps of mine, and this is the watch that LOTS of members have asked me to review over the years. TT Sub is kind of a "newbie magnet" in many ways.

 

This replica model is not new, but the factory has introduced one very dramatic change: Better (smaller) winding crown. This is much welcomed improvement, because the "Jumbo" crown used to ruin this rep competely.

 

Other than the crown, this watch is basically a Noobmariner with gold parts. By many (including me) the Noobmariner is considered be the best ever-out-of-the-box Submariner replica.

 

The crown guards and pearl are very reasonable, and good enough as they are. And once again, only the "Noob" Rolexes have the correct, thick cylindrical "front rehaut". The other factories (including MBW and TW models) aren't quite as good in this regard. However, the actual rehaut depth is about one millimeter too low on the "Noob factory" Submariners.

RkQ3hSV.jpg

 

In the "old days" the last link that connected the bracelet to the SEL used to be just layered with a thin surface of gold, and the side of this area was left "naked"... i.e stainless steel on the side was visible underneath the gold layer (on top). That was another serious flaw and "deal breaker" on this rep, which has been fixed for this particular model.

 

Just like the SS Noobmariner, the lugs are beautifully finished.

YParJU9.jpg

 

The usual question is: "How good is the blue"?

 

Well, I can safely say it's pretty damn good. Older models used to bee too "purple", but this watch doesn't have the problem. Blue is deep and rich.

 

Here's the rep and gen side-by-side. The following photo is courtesy by member "JNKAI" (thanks). This is the exact same replica model, but notice how awfully HUGE the winding crown was before the "update". Utterly ridiculous.

 

Like I said, I'm glad it has been fixed. Oversized crown is very typical problem with most Rolex replicas, and frankly I don't understand why it is so difficult to get right.

ICSIjWs.jpg

 

 

This brings us to the best part of this watch, which is the dial. Just like on its stainless steel counterpart it's virtually perfect. This factory really knows to get the dials correct, and regarding the Rolex reps it's once again in the league of its own. Just for fun, you can check how my "Noob factory" GMT Master II dial compares with the genuine HERE.

d7v0xnK.jpg

 

The best dial photo of this watch is from John Holmbrook's Rolex Reference Page, which I used as a source once again. I tried to shoot my watch from the exact same angle and here's the result. (Genuine on the right).

i6kAXCc.jpg

 

As you can see the only differences worth mentioning are the minute hand (gen has larger luminous area), and the datewheel (which fills the larger area of the cyclops). The gens come with two different bezel font colors (gold and plain yellow). Both are correct. You can't seriously except the rep dial to get better than this. I was also positively surprised that hands and hour markers have the same luminous abilities on this watch. Usually lume on the hands is much weaker.

 

 

My intial impression of the bracelet wasn't great, as it was in dire need of oiling. That's very typical for the replica Rolex Oyster bands. The links were stiff, made noise and didn't feel smooth at all. Oiling, as usual, changed the feel immediately.

 

After having the watch in my possession for a week, and after comparing it to countless of gen pics I began to appreciate the bracelet a lot more. The gold tone might be different from the 18K, but I doubt it could be detected easily. I was going to get a gen TT "Serti" Sub from my friend for the comparison for this article, but unfortunately his long business trip ruined this plan. Experts say that the 14K gold tone isn't quite as rich as the gen 18K. The gen (supposedly) has more "creamy" color, while the rep tone is more yellow.

 

Eurotimez posted a thread about the bracelet, and according to him the middle links are solid 14K gold.

 

According to Eurotimez, the gold in this particular TT Sub comes in three different qualities:

 

Plated 18k (will fade and wear off quickly)

Cheaper gold with a thin 14k layer that will eventually get off, leaving ugly black spots where it wears.

Solid 14k gold (this particular watch in the review) = never wears off.

MErt7N0.jpg

 

As you can see the clasp has a gold layer all through its surface, and it's absolutely IMPOSSIBLE to keep scratch free.

 

Gold layering on the clasp area (around the coronet) isn't quite as smooth on the rep, which could be detectable. Same can be said about the crown, the layer isn't perfectly smooth. But it's good to keep in mind that we're talking about rep of a $8K watch here.

 

PS: What many people don't know is that all parts on the genuine 16613 aren't solid gold, either. The gen has plated crown and clasp area.

 

 

Based on my experience, treating the rep TT Oyster bracelet with car wax is the best option to make it feel more substantial. It makes a difference. One annoying thing about the TT Oyster band (rep and gen) is how easily it collects microscopic hairline scratches. You only have to breath into its direction to get it scratched. Merely photographing this watch was enough to get a few of them here and there. Not that it would bother me, but I hope the customer who will receive this watch isn't one of those "anal types".

 

Here's the traditional review wrist shot. This definitely is a pretty watch.

vUFLvuj.jpg

 

 

Conclusion:

 

Without a doubt this is the best TT Sub replica I have ever seen. And that's exactly why I wanted to review it in the first place. Now that the crown has been fixed, I seriously doubt this can be repped much better. I'm impressed how detailed the finish on this watch is. The dial is utterly amazing, and the plated bezel and pearl are very good as well. It would be very interesting to compare this against the new MBK version, and hopefully I have a chance to do that in the near future.

 

 

Thanks again our new dealer, ***"Eurotimez"*** for borrowing this beauty. Good luck with your business ventures! Thanks all members for your continuous support, and I hope you enjoyed this another small pictorial of mine.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
By-Tor

Old review from 2008 uploaded. This was actually the second best ever TT Sub 16613 rep out there. Then WM9 version came out. It was even better. But this definitely was a good rep (and it would still be one).

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
bloon

I can´t find this version on TD websites. Has the model been discontinued?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
NCRich

Yes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
patooo

So having been away for a while I’m wondering have we had any useful 16613 tt bluesy additions ? Anything approaching this quality? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
FoxWilde
4 minutes ago, patooo said:

So having been away for a while I’m wondering have we had any useful 16613 tt bluesy additions ? Anything approaching this quality? 

Well, BP released some recently...

Besides that there's always the current Noob models, as well as GMF. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
patooo
23 minutes ago, FoxWilde said:

Well, BP released some recently...

Besides that there's always the current Noob models, as well as GMF. 

Brother I’m definitely out of practise :) BP - I copy that. But the 16613 or the 116613? Noobmariners ate still around.....good.... never heard of gmf.... Is there any particular dealer currently standing out in terms of quality?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
FoxWilde
9 hours ago, patooo said:

Brother I’m definitely out of practise :) BP - I copy that. But the 16613 or the 116613? Noobmariners ate still around.....good.... never heard of gmf.... Is there any particular dealer currently standing out in terms of quality?

Well BP's latest releases are for 116613s...

BP does have 16613s that were released last summer I think. I'm sure those TD websites have more info.

In regards to dealers... I've worked with Mary, Andrew from Trusty, MarvRep, Robbie from Aootime,  and Toro. I'd recommend any of these fine dealers, they'll find what you want.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
patooo

I was going done digging and I located those models you kindly referenced... my ideal is the 16613 but a lot of  folks seem to praise the 116613 by vrf.... I went for a bp 16613 in 2013 and it was burple with a terrible bracelet.... 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×