Stuvetjee 17 Posted August 22, 2014 (edited) Rant: Well goddamned. From 1 to 10 it looks alright, after that its shit... Done with this crap all the time! Crap dates, crap bezels, crap case finishing, crap QC... FFS i know its a rep, but for $400 (and reps keep getting expensiver)?! And whatsup with that freaking claps? Diver extension pops a bit up... Rant over... Just spend all my funds Need to save for some kenny magic :P Atleast we can have a laugh how arsed this looks on the new DSSD rep... Edited August 22, 2014 by Stuvetjee Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
avrahamk1 0 Posted August 22, 2014 Wtf it was 400$? What version is it that it came this way? Don't you think about repair/replace it through the TD? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TheInthusiest 0 Posted August 22, 2014 (edited) What are you talking about? You wanted a rolex, so you bought a rep. Either way, rep and gen Rolex's are the same quality. Edited August 22, 2014 by TheInthusiest Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Stuvetjee 17 Posted August 22, 2014 Wtf it was 400$? What version is it that it came this way? Don't you think about repair/replace it through the TD? Latest version Noob and yes indeed it was $400... No id rather let it fix by KeNnY with some lume magice added, because sending it back will take months. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Stuvetjee 17 Posted August 22, 2014 What are you talking about? You wanted a rolex, so you bought a rep. Either way, rep and gen Rolex's are the same quality. Man, screw you! Obviously you didnt read the article from ABTW about the Rolex factory Here you go: http://www.ablogtowatch.com/10-things-know-rolex-makes-watches/ Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Daywatch 4 Posted August 22, 2014 At a $400 pricetag I would rant for weeks. Send it back.... Using the diver extension with seemless adjustment for 1 Year now and it is one of the best designed clasp systems ever, better than the glide-lock system, there must be something wrong with Yours. Good luck in sorting this out. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TheInthusiest 0 Posted August 22, 2014 What are you talking about? You wanted a rolex, so you bought a rep. Either way, rep and gen Rolex's are the same quality. Man, screw you! Obviously you didnt read the article from ABTW about the Rolex factory Here you go: http://www.ablogtowatch.com/10-things-know-rolex-makes-watches/ Yup. Kool. Low tech movements. Made in-house. Takes too long to make. Loses it heritage. Stupidly over priced. Idk why people are falling heads over heels for modern rolex. Vintage rolex is a-ok. Modern = ew. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
avrahamk1 0 Posted August 22, 2014 Man it is noticeable as f how did you accept the QC? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Stuvetjee 17 Posted August 22, 2014 (edited) What are you talking about? You wanted a rolex, so you bought a rep. Either way, rep and gen Rolex's are the same quality. Man, screw you! Obviously you didnt read the article from ABTW about the Rolex factory Here you go: http://www.ablogtowa...-makes-watches/ Yup. Kool. Low tech movements. Made in-house. Takes too long to make. Loses it heritage. Stupidly over priced. Idk why people are falling heads over heels for modern rolex. Vintage rolex is a-ok. Modern = ew. Daytona has a low tech movement? Yachmaster II has a low tech movement? Sky-Dweller has a low tech movement? Dont think so buddy. They losed their heritage? I dont see that really. Edited August 22, 2014 by Stuvetjee Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Stuvetjee 17 Posted August 22, 2014 Man it is noticeable as f how did you accept the QC? Asked if the date was centered and the TD said yes. Well maybe he didnt pass the 10 with QC. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TheInthusiest 0 Posted August 22, 2014 What are you talking about? You wanted a rolex, so you bought a rep. Either way, rep and gen Rolex's are the same quality. Man, screw you! Obviously you didnt read the article from ABTW about the Rolex factory Here you go: http://www.ablogtowa...-makes-watches/ Yup. Kool. Low tech movements. Made in-house. Takes too long to make. Loses it heritage. Stupidly over priced. Idk why people are falling heads over heels for modern rolex. Vintage rolex is a-ok. Modern = ew. Daytona has a low tech movement? Yachmaster II has a low tech movement? Sky-Dweller has a low tech movement? Dont think so buddy. They losed their heritage? I dont see that really. Give me one moment while I find a few watches which cost less and do more. Brb Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Stuvetjee 17 Posted August 22, 2014 At a $400 pricetag I would rant for weeks. Send it back.... Using the diver extension with seemless adjustment for 1 Year now and it is one of the best designed clasp systems ever, better than the glide-lock system, there must be something wrong with Yours. Good luck in sorting this out. Yeah well, your right about that. But it takes months before getting a watch back. Im really not in the mood for waiting that long :P. So might as well send it to one of our modders. Perhaps will save to for a gen dial and insert. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Eadesy 6 Posted August 22, 2014 I too would be pissed Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Stuvetjee 17 Posted August 22, 2014 What are you talking about? You wanted a rolex, so you bought a rep. Either way, rep and gen Rolex's are the same quality. Man, screw you! Obviously you didnt read the article from ABTW about the Rolex factory Here you go: http://www.ablogtowa...-makes-watches/ Yup. Kool. Low tech movements. Made in-house. Takes too long to make. Loses it heritage. Stupidly over priced. Idk why people are falling heads over heels for modern rolex. Vintage rolex is a-ok. Modern = ew. Daytona has a low tech movement? Yachmaster II has a low tech movement? Sky-Dweller has a low tech movement? Dont think so buddy. They losed their heritage? I dont see that really. Give me one moment while I find a few watches which cost less and do more. Brb Its not about the cost. I only mentioned your comment ''Low tech''. I dont think the movements are low tech.... as for the price they are indeed overpriced. But if you look how obsessed they are about QC and not to forget the only brand that uses 904L pattened steel. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Stuvetjee 17 Posted August 22, 2014 I too would be pissed If the watch were $250 i would care less than now because these reps cost freaking $400 :P Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TheInthusiest 0 Posted August 22, 2014 What are you talking about? You wanted a rolex, so you bought a rep. Either way, rep and gen Rolex's are the same quality. Man, screw you! Obviously you didnt read the article from ABTW about the Rolex factory Here you go: http://www.ablogtowa...-makes-watches/ Yup. Kool. Low tech movements. Made in-house. Takes too long to make. Loses it heritage. Stupidly over priced. Idk why people are falling heads over heels for modern rolex. Vintage rolex is a-ok. Modern = ew. Daytona has a low tech movement? Yachmaster II has a low tech movement? Sky-Dweller has a low tech movement? Dont think so buddy. They losed their heritage? I dont see that really. Give me one moment while I find a few watches which cost less and do more. Brb Its not about the cost. I only mentioned your comment ''Low tech''. I dont think the movements are low tech.... as for the price they are indeed overpriced. But if you look how obsessed they are about QC and not to forget the only brand that uses 904L pattened steel. If I was a little less tired and if it wasn't 1:30am and if I want juggling chatting with my friends in a different language, I would be literally RIPPING the shit out of this thread. Lucky for you, I won't, Until I wake up tomorrow morning. HAHAHAH Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Chavezzito 121 Posted August 22, 2014 And by the title I thought you went to a dating center... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
James-H 0 Posted August 22, 2014 I've just about given up on buying reps with a date window, they're pretty much always off-centre! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
George. 34 Posted August 22, 2014 And by the title I thought you went to a dating center... +1 I was looking forward to some horrendous first date stories Shame Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Stuvetjee 17 Posted August 22, 2014 (edited) What are you talking about? You wanted a rolex, so you bought a rep. Either way, rep and gen Rolex's are the same quality. Man, screw you! Obviously you didnt read the article from ABTW about the Rolex factory Here you go: http://www.ablogtowa...-makes-watches/ Yup. Kool. Low tech movements. Made in-house. Takes too long to make. Loses it heritage. Stupidly over priced. Idk why people are falling heads over heels for modern rolex. Vintage rolex is a-ok. Modern = ew. Daytona has a low tech movement? Yachmaster II has a low tech movement? Sky-Dweller has a low tech movement? Dont think so buddy. They losed their heritage? I dont see that really. Give me one moment while I find a few watches which cost less and do more. Brb Its not about the cost. I only mentioned your comment ''Low tech''. I dont think the movements are low tech.... as for the price they are indeed overpriced. But if you look how obsessed they are about QC and not to forget the only brand that uses 904L pattened steel. If I was a little less tired and if it wasn't 1:30am and if I want juggling chatting with my friends in a different language, I would be literally RIPPING the shit out of this thread. Lucky for you, I won't, Until I wake up tomorrow morning. HAHAHAH Well im intrigued how much you want to rip Rolex apart. You cant understand people buying Rolexe's. Well i cant understand how someone can be against a brand so much like you (except the vintage). Each their own brand IMHO. Edited August 22, 2014 by Stuvetjee Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Stuvetjee 17 Posted August 22, 2014 And by the title I thought you went to a dating center... I actually did that on purpose and see who would be the first to spot And by the title I thought you went to a dating center... +1 I was looking forward to some horrendous first date stories Shame Have alot of those though, doesnt seem to be the appropiate ection Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Chavezzito 121 Posted August 22, 2014 I actually did that on purpose and see who would be the first to spot Wohooo! What did I win? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Stuvetjee 17 Posted August 22, 2014 I actually did that on purpose and see who would be the first to spot Wohooo! What did I win? I still have a ''Sexual Favor'' coupon from MNaji that he included in the PAM sale but due far distance, i couldnt claim it. Its all yours buddy Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Chavezzito 121 Posted August 22, 2014 I actually did that on purpose and see who would be the first to spot Wohooo! What did I win? I still have a ''Sexual Favor'' coupon from MNaji that he included in the PAM sale but due far distance, i couldnt claim it. Its all yours buddy Does she look good? Might be worth traveling Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Stuvetjee 17 Posted August 22, 2014 I actually did that on purpose and see who would be the first to spot Wohooo! What did I win? I still have a ''Sexual Favor'' coupon from MNaji that he included in the PAM sale but due far distance, i couldnt claim it. Its all yours buddy Does she look good? Might be worth traveling Dont know maybe thats the surprise, perhaps you can have both? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
