Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Arism

BP Rolex 1675 GMT Master

Recommended Posts

Arism

Hi guys!

 

Just in from Toro a few nights ago, and haven't seen too many reviews of the BP 1675 GMT-Master straight out of the box.

It's been a very long time since I got a new rep. My collection had been reduced to 2 gens and 1 rep (technically two, but my beloved Space-Dweller is buggered and not yet repaired). The vintage rolex bug bit me when I embarked on the Space-Dweller project years ago and has never really left. So when I saw these up on Toro's website for $158** (Asian 2813), I couldn't resist. The GMT Master has been my grail for as long as I can remember (though I have been tempted by other watches elsewhere, mostly by you guys but I mean who hasn't? :giggle: ). One could even go as far to say the watch fuelled my childhood ambition and now career in aviation.

 

Now the GMT Master doesn't really need an introduction. Almost everyone knows the story, but for those that don't;

 

"The Rolex GMT-Master wristwatch was originally designed in collaboration with Pan American Airways and issued by the airline to their crews on long-haul flights. ("GMT" in the name stands for Greenwich Mean Time also known as Coordinated Universal Time). The original GMT Master watch has a 24-hour display fourth hand complication directly linked to and displaying the same time zone as the standard 12-hour hand. This GMT hand enabled the crews to set the watch to GMT or another time zone, and, using the rotatable 24-hour scale bezel, set to the correct offset, a second time zone could be read. GMT or UTC is the time zone that is required for all aviation planning, weather forecasts, schedules and other paperwork."

courtesy of wikipedia

 

Now whether that story is reality is a whole other debate, but I digress.

The first GMT Master was the Ref 6542(Informally known as the Pussy Galore, in homage to character in James Bond's Goldfinger) released in 1954.

No crown guards and bakelite bezel(though these were replaced a few years later due to the susceptibility of bakelite to cracking).

Rolex-GMT-Master-History-9743.jpg

 

In 1959 the Ref 1675 was introduced. The reference was produced until 1980, which makes it one of the longest running models in the Rolex line up. This came with the addition of crown guards; some pointed (known as El Cornino) and regular squared ones like pictured below.

Rolex-GMT-Master-History-9697.jpg

 

Now everyone who has read up on reps would know there is no perfect rep, even more so with vintage Rolex reps. All of them seem to require some form of work to make them more "gen" like. Fortunately we are blessed with some amazing modders on the forum; the likes of Kenny and Rolex Addict to just name a few. Or you could go the DIY way. Either way, some of the work has been drool worthy.

On to the review!

*****

 

 

The watch did originally come with the standard cartel folded 7836 bracelet (Though Toro pictures it coming with a rivet bracelet on his website), but I changed it to the jubilee bracelet that came with my franken 16030 Datejust. This was done because I prefer the look and the jubilee turned out to be more comfortable. The folded bracelet is tinny, rattly and light. Just like the genuine article. The particular watch I ordered was the "Black Bezel Orange Dot". I chose the Asian 2813 movement as it is closer to the gen's 19,600vph and having previously owned a GMT IIc rep; is supposedly more stable/reliable than the modified Asian 2836. The GMT hand is independently adjustable in all choices of movement, unlike the gen, but at the benefit to the user, as they can directly set "home" time on the normal hands, GMT on the other and track a third time zone with the bezel. I however use it as per the gen, home time for both normal and GMT hands, while using the bezel to track GMT/UTC.

 

35025151572_4767509845_b.jpg

Overall the watch looks pretty good to my eye. The lume is very orange. Reminiscent of the spray tans you used to see in the early 2000s. I've never seen any gens outside of the Khanjar & Qaboos 1665s that have a similar shade of lume. However I prefer this look to the lemon yellow on some other vintage reps. The lume on hands relatively match the indices, albeit a shade lighter. The red of GMT hand has a slightly metallic refection, which I think needs to be more matte to be honest.

 

To my eyes, the text looks passible and within the tolerances expected in a rep. A perfectionist could say that the Rolex is too bold but at least it doesn't say "Oyster Perpetual Date" like the older 1675 reps!

The coronet is of course wrong. The 1675 never had the so called "frog-foot" coronet that appeared on the ref 1655 Explorer reportedly made famous by a man named McQueen.

 

Another flaw would be the fact that the watch comes with applied indices, which certainly did not occur in the GMT Master until ref 16750 in 1980. This somewhat boggles my mind as surely it would be easier and cheaper to have non-applied indices rather than coating/painting the applied indices! If it can be done for vintage Submariner reps, surely the same could be done for the GMT Master. :noway:

 

34803826130_350a5c5bbf_b.jpg

Applied indices are clearly visible here.

 

The watch comes with a plexi rather than sapphire, so is rather susceptible to scratches as per gen. The bezel as far as I am led to believe is of genuine type construction. Which is the non-ratcheting, friction fit type. On my particular watch, the bezel turns with minimal resistance but once set in place, doesn't move unless I change the position myself. Which is good. Though I have read that some others have loose bezels which may turn freely. The bezel insert itself is rather glossy in finish and while the numbers do seem accurate; when comparing between pictures of gen bezels, the rep seems a tad small in print. We could go on and on about "hooked twos" and "fours shaped like this and that"regarding the font of the bezel, but if it really is a big issue, you could replace it with a gen or third party bezel. Do note that the rep bezels are slightly narrower in diameter for the insert, so to fit a genuine insert you'd either need to sand it down to size or replace the bezel entirely to a gen spec from Clark's or WSO.

 

The date wheel is one of open 6 & 9 variety, which I believe is correct for this reference. The "orange dot" rep comes with a cream coloured date wheel while the white lumed version comes with a white one. Printing on the date wheel is of good quality and of the raised type. All the dates on my particular watch are nicely centred and change over promptly at midnight.

*****

 

 

The crown on the gen 1675 is 5.3mm, while the rep is slightly bigger. The coronet on the rep to my eyes is not great. Too wide and not the ring shape. Looks like a more squashed version of the coronet on the dial. The crown guards are noticeably stubby. They are just not prominent enough and definitely require some reshaping to be more gen like.

34345837874_ce333ba96b_b.jpg

 

The case back on this rep is totally wrong. The ref 1675 never came with this case back and you would need a source a replacement to be closer to gen. I also feel that due to this case back, the watch sits slightly higher on the wrist, but it doesn't hamper wearability. It looks like they have used the case back of a 5513 rep or the 1655 rep. Not a big issue as on the wrist you can't see it, but again, totally wrong.

35190448905_9b71e76937_b.jpg

*****

 

 

Overall fit and finish is generally pretty good. The watch does even have chamfered lugs though not as prominent as on NOS gens. The edges however a razor sharp. Especially in-between the lugs. To me, not a big issue as you could always soften the edges during modding. There does appear to be some tooling marks left behind on the rear of the mid case.

35060023431_8c379f7331_b.jpg

There appears to be a line that goes all around the case back. Photo above shows the line starting from the upper crown guard, the previous photo has the same line starting from the end link. Not really sure what it is but it is noticeable by the naked eye. However it is on the rear of the watch, so not a deal breaker in my opinion. The engravings in-between the lugs say "Orig. Registered Design 1675" and the serial is of the 3mil variety.

 

Overall I'd give this rep a 7/10 in terms of out the box. It's a good place to start if you want to mod your way to a 1675. So far the watch is keeping good time and I'm having a blast wearing it. I'm happy to leave this unmodded as sooner or later I will spring for the genuine article.

35025151542_d55d2e7438_b.jpg

 

And a couple of quick and dirty shots of the watch in it's natural environment!

35150200256_1afac5fa61_b.jpg

34380924833_42d3850ce1_b.jpg

 

Hope you enjoyed this review!

Cheers and happy landings!

Edited by Arism

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
NCRich

Its a massively bad rep that could have been made much better quite easily. Almost everything about it is wrong, from the case and caseback to the bezel, to the godawful dial. But it is the best 1675 rep we have. You can actually make a much better 1675 from the 1655 cartel rep which has been OOS for a long time but now is back. 1655 case with Clark bezel assembly, insert, and plexi, and a Vietnam dial is as good as you can get without spending stupid money. I've built a dozen from the 1675 base and I really don't like the construction at all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
MAJ75

Great job on the write up regardless of the overall quality & flaws present on the timepiece.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
NCRich

Great job on the write up regardless of the overall quality & flaws present on the timepiece.

 

Yes, didn't mean that to be a criticism of the write up. It was good, its the rep that's bad :lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Arism

Great job on the write up regardless of the overall quality & flaws present on the timepiece.

 

Yes, didn't mean that to be a criticism of the write up. It was good, its the rep that's bad :lol:

No worries Rich, the review was my take on the out of the box rep. As you mentioned; the 1655 rep would be the best base if you wanted to build a truly great 1675 rep. Just wish there was a better rep available but it's the best we got.

 

Not accusing you of anything Rich, but you mentioning the 1655 reps are back is not what my wallet wanted to hear!:lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
NCRich

Great job on the write up regardless of the overall quality & flaws present on the timepiece.

 

Yes, didn't mean that to be a criticism of the write up. It was good, its the rep that's bad :lol:

No worries Rich, the review was my take on the out of the box rep. As you mentioned; the 1655 rep would be the best base if you wanted to build a truly great 1675 rep. Just wish there was a better rep available but it's the best we got.

 

Not accusing you of anything Rich, but you mentioning the 1655 reps are back is not what my wallet wanted to hear! :lol:

 

Yeah, got one in the air as we speak. I have a problem............

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Arism

 

Yeah, got one in the air as we speak. I have a problem............

 

Don't we all! :lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Diver Dave

Great article, and timely as I just ordered one of these (and a 1655 so I can compare the two)

 

Just a correction though on how the older GMT's were actually used by pilots crossing multiple timezones daily (having done this work, crossing the international date line routinely and trying to work times for weather, flight planning, and waking up in the hotel, while wearing two Gen 1675's: One a 1960's vintage solid gold and one a 1970's vintage Gold & SS).

 

On the old GMT's, where the 24 hour hand and the 12 hour hand are "married", the way the watches were set was to set the native watch to GMT and to then track the (ever changing) local times using the rotating bezel, not the other way around. This is such an obvious thing if you think about it: You never unscrew the crown and reset the watch, just rotate the bezel. Remember we are talking about using the watch across multiple time zones every day. The date feature using this method is also important, as there's been more than one pilot confused about what day it is when flying across the date line. With the watch set natively to GMT, all of the weather information (which globally is produced in GMT, now UCT actually) can be correctly referenced to the date. Remember that as far as we're concerned Pearl Harbor was bombed on Sunday morning December 7th. The Japanese show it being bombed just before sunrise on December 8th. So these things can REALLY screw up a long distance pilot.Even the guys flying across the Atlantic don't see the value in this (you're flying TOWARDS GMT and not away from it, so it's easy to track time), but man... when you fly west across the Pacific... you can screw this up really quickly... If you set your "house time" on the watch and then use the bezel for Zulu, you WILL screw up the "what day is it?" question when you're sitting exhausted in Singapore one day (or is it night, and when did I last eat and WTF am I doing awake at 1:00AM here and WTF time is it back home so I can Skype the wife..."). OK, you get it.

 

If you're flying domestic and only working three time zones and GMT you can get away with your house-time (AKA "when do I call the wife?" time") on the watch and use the bezel for Zulu, but once you start across the Pacific from NYC to Japan... trust me, you want Zulu on the watch and "hotel wakeup time" on the bezel.

 

Pan Am was the company that drove this watch into production. They were flying the Pacific trans-oceanic routes, and this is how they used the watches.

 

For a business traveller today... you might want to have your local time set as the watch time, but no pilot in the old days would have done that.

 

 

Great writeup!

 

 

Dave

Edited by Diver Dave

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Arism

Thanks for the words Dave. The furthest I fly at the moment is only +/- 4hrs from my local timezone hence just using setting it to my home time and using the bezel to track GMT.

I actually had set the hands to GMT and used the bezel to track local when I first received the watch, but woke up to a shock when I glanced towards the bedside and saw 10:30 displayed when my sign on for that duty was at 10am! In reality it was 22:30 and 6:30am local. :Doh::lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Diver Dave

Thanks for the words Dave. The furthest I fly at the moment is only +/- 4hrs from my local timezone hence just using setting it to my home time and using the bezel to track GMT.

I actually had set the hands to GMT and used the bezel to track local when I first received the watch, but woke up to a shock when I glanced towards the bedside and saw 10:30 displayed when my sign on for that duty was at 10am! In reality it was 22:30 and 6:30am local. :Doh::lol:

 

 

I figured that out when I saw the fixes on the flightplan log in the pics... (recognizing almost every VOR in the known world. ;-) )

 

STA is Santa Marta, unless I read the log wrong.

 

 

Had the "WTF!!" moment in the hotel room more than once!

 

 

Time for this classic. he was late for his trip too....

 

 

 

Dave

Edited by Diver Dave

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Foxindebox

Great review mate :clap:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×