Pam392 42mm Luminor1950 is out.Opinions?

[gvln68 0]

here we go:

http://www.torobravos2014.com/index.php?route=product/product&product_id=1301

as i see Reg TM on CG is not on correct place...

will it more comfy on thin wrist? 44mm Luminor1950 for me is a bit bold

[ellistyle1 0]

Hmmm--looks good to me, but I own no Pams. I like it. Not keen on the movement though

[Ji4040 0]

I'm also interested, as the one I got from TT was such a crap of a watch. The CG lever fell off(at least they sent me a new one), the back crystal cracked, the strap changing pins or push button got jammed and the lumes did not have any lumes, it was so neon green, such an easy tell. Strap was crap. Font was white, not cream color. I ended up giving it away.

Hope this one gets better reviews, then it might become a hot seller, since a lot of people do so much search for that "smaller Pam", especially the newbies, me included.

Good luck!

[Higs 73]

I'd like it more if the date wheel lined up with the window.

 

Edited December 21, 2014 by Higs

[mrbobdobalina 0]

I like it, looks a lot more balanced visually than the 312.

[greg_r 81]

Meh.

[spursian 0]

Nah. Rather wait for the 512 instead....

[Mike 1108 0]

Meh.

^^^THIS

[gvln68 0]

sure

[mysterio 18]

Meh +2

 

Already got the PAM312 and the PAM359 and I'm used to 44mm minimum for PAMs. Please the whole crown/CG is wrong, the case shape is wrong as well, it certainly won't convince me to part with my money with those credentials.

[Teddyfigo 4]

Probably wait for KW version .

[stevok2305 1]

Not for me thanks. Way to many tells. And don't mind 44mm plus watches.