Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
ebzen02

PP 5975

Recommended Posts

ebzen02

Josh just posted these..thoughts

b8a4896ab5e5900d0d688146be396644.jpg

 

45f1193513b9486be6c23310e5502c02.jpg

Edited by ebzen02

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Kleen™

"Gradue Pour IS Pulsations"...WTF....?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ebzen02

Closed caseback and dimensions not too far off. I like it myself.

Lmao

Edited by ebzen02

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ebzen02

Gen

 

611500799703ffd3ceded13935a379cd.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
machiavegli

I'm meh on the gen. I think a true classic PP shouldn't look busier than a Breit. But it's all a matter of taste!

 

-Mach

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Kleen™

The fuzzier dial-print I could live with...but the IS instead of 15 would annoy me...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Big Adam
I'm meh on the gen. I think a true classic PP shouldn't look busier than a Breit. But it's all a matter of taste!

 

-Mach

Spot on. If this was branded Breitling, it'd be spot on. PP just seems wrong.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Rav747

318? Jesus! I think I'm getting too cheap for the rep game.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Godfathar

Looool @ IS instead of 15. What a miss!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
BadPickle
318? Jesus! I think I'm getting too cheap for the rep game.

 

 

+1million ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Jooost

For a Patek, I think it's a pretty decent rep. Besides the 15 error, it look as per gen. Just don't think it is a pretty watch for Patek standards, even the gen isn't in my opinion.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
_DC_

Just wish they'd stop mucking about making the new models and get the old ones right first, give us a more accurate 5070 and 5170, then worry about the new stuff!!!

 

DC

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
_DC_

PS: What would bug me more than the "IS" would be the fact that it's meant to be a chronograph and I'm pretty sure it has no chronograph functionality... unless anyone can correct me, the 9015 isn't a chrono movement?!?

 

DC

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
_DC_

The more I look at it the more I'm thinking of getting one!

 

For those saying the dial is too busy for a Patek I can see why you'd say that (they're better known for their uncluttered simplicity) but sector dials are as "Patek" as perpetual calendar chronographs!

 

It's an aquired taste, but one that is growing on me, I'm quite keen on a sector dial 5296 too!!

 

DC

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Godfathar

^^ why am I not surprise!!

 

We will be looking forward to "THE DC REVIEW: Calatrava 5975 175th Anniversary - Miyota 9015" :thumbsup:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×