TBRNY 0 Posted December 28, 2017 Looks like a QC Pic to me. Can't do that here Share this post Link to post
iamonline 0 Posted December 28, 2017 I am not sure what version that is, but it looks quite nice. Share this post Link to post
SteveA 308 Posted December 28, 2017 If these are QC photos this will be nuked soon Share this post Link to post
TBRNY 0 Posted December 29, 2017 26 minutes ago, SteveA said: If these are QC photos this will be nuked soon what do you mean by nuked? Did I not follow rules or something? Just wanted an honest opinion on a watch I want to buy from a friend Share this post Link to post
NCRich 13,752 Posted December 29, 2017 So these are from your friend and not a dealer? If so that is ok. Otherwise not. Share this post Link to post
ShelbyForthright 0 Posted December 29, 2017 (edited) Looks good, I can't see any flaws. But you are not permitted to post QC pictures on RWG. 30 minutes ago, NCRich said: So these are from your friend and not a dealer? If so that is ok. Otherwise not. Do the same rules apply even though the QCs are posted in form of a link to another website? I can't see any rule/policy against links to images. Edited December 29, 2017 by ShelbyForthright grammatical error Share this post Link to post
drifterr 0 Posted December 29, 2017 Definitely QC pics from dealer.. Watch looks awesome. I have the same . But current version is V7 from noob Good luck Sent from my SM-G950F using Tapatalk Share this post Link to post
NCRich 13,752 Posted December 29, 2017 34 minutes ago, ShelbyForthright said: Looks good, I can't see any flaws. But you are not permitted to post QC pictures on RWG. Do the same rules apply even though the QCs are posted in form of a link to another website? I can't see any rule/policy against links to images. Splitting hairs my friend. No QC pics. Share this post Link to post
