Jump to content
yonexsp

Is this real? Rolex Sub-C

Recommended Posts

yonexsp

Looking at a Rolex Sub, but impossible to tell from the pictures, seller has box & papers etc etc

3abd5dd514bc61ddfa013cd47719ef5c.jpg

 

13658bbb7e750581152585f3880da271.jpg

 

72ec03622ccca0de956a071899cab5a0.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
GenTLe

Looks gen to me, but I'm not an uber expert so don't buy just based on my comment.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
lrnz

Looks gen to me too, have him show you the serial number on the warranty and check if it's the same at 6 o'clock on the rehaut, but anyway this looks gen.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
k3rm87

Looks gen to me, but can never be sure. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Thommo82

Gen to my eyes 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Stewart

I would suggest buying a gen at a reputable retailer. If you are not sure of it's authenticity there is already a problem.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
repmaster1234

If it's too good to be true... then it's too good to be true. That being said it looks gen. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Moondustesp

It’s definitely brushed as gen :daffy:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Thommo82

Ask seller if it has gen bracelet smell before pulling the trigger. Just to be sure 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
slashdotcom

so...it looks like a gen, but you cannot be sure from a pic. it's really big risk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
FL13

Curious why the 1000ft=300m doesn't match this one.

 

z109135-IMG-0227.jpg

 

Also, the printing seems a little ghostly....

I'd wager Rep... 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Thommo82

More I look at it, more like a rep it looks. Bezel numbers look a little too dark, possibly just lighting though, dial print ain’t exactly popping like it should either 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
odoherc

Meet him at an AD so they can verify it's gen? I wouldn't buy it going on photo's and having it posted to me !!!!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Lagger

Looks 100 % legit to me, if you are worried though move along

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Logixa

Looks gen in shitty lighting. 

@FL13 rolex changes the dial every year, it's near impossible to be certain these days haha.

@yonexsp meet at an Ad and open the case back, only way to tell if it's Gen 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
FL13
47 minutes ago, Logixa said:

Looks gen in shitty lighting. 

@FL13 rolex changes the dial every year, it's near impossible to be certain these days haha.

@yonexsp meet at an Ad and open the case back, only way to tell if it's Gen 

Every rep I find has the same text with the tilted."=" sign. Every gen 116610. I find it's strsight.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
GingerBlubba

Why are you dicks debating whether a watch that the OP might (or might not) have bought SEVEN MONTHS ago is Gen? Necroposting muddyfunsters.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
RepGuy
6 minutes ago, GingerBlubba said:

Why are you dicks debating whether a watch that the OP might (or might not) have bought SEVEN MONTHS ago is Gen? Necroposting muddyfunsters.

Because fuck you, that's why.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

P.S. :johng:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
GingerBlubba

Right back atcha :fme:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
RepGuy
7 minutes ago, GingerBlubba said:

Right back atcha :fme:

flat,550x550,075,f.u4.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
0ysterboy

Hey Rep Guy, guerrilla not gorilla.  Guess they didn't pay much attention to spelling in sniperin' school, huh?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
GingerBlubba

:rofl: Fecking loser.

That is quite funny though :thumbsup2:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
narikaa
1 hour ago, GingerBlubba said:

Why are you dicks debating whether a watch that the OP might (or might not) have bought SEVEN MONTHS ago is Gen? Necroposting muddyfunsters.

 

 

Because its what Rolex folks do

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Thommo82
4 hours ago, GingerBlubba said:

Why are you dicks debating whether a watch that the OP might (or might not) have bought SEVEN MONTHS ago is Gen? Necroposting muddyfunsters.

Because, Cocaine 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×