CurioLeo 296 Posted February 21, 2019 https://rover.ebay.com/rover/0/0/0?mpre=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ebay.co.uk%2Fulk%2Fitm%2F173789173588 What is the consensus ? I was under the impression a genuine PAM 002 had 30ATM on the caseback and a DSN rep said 300m so that would make this a rep. Also, without a swan neck, it is hard to tell if the movement is a rep at the resolution provided. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BadApple 13,081 Posted February 21, 2019 The box is one you get off DH Gate and doesn't match the age and wear of the watch itself. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CurioLeo 296 Posted February 21, 2019 Yep, and the warranty card photo is useless. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jibuti 958 Posted February 22, 2019 I think watch is gen, movement 200%. the rest of...not...just added to complete impression but made more damage than helped. seller would be better off just selling it w/o box and papers... and as gen not overpriced. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Golfer130i 4 Posted February 22, 2019 I think the box should have gold plated fittings and not silver. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CurioLeo 296 Posted February 24, 2019 On 23/02/2019 at 07:35, Jibuti said: I think watch is gen, movement 200%. the rest of...not...just added to complete impression but made more damage than helped. seller would be better off just selling it w/o box and papers... and as gen not overpriced. Have you ever seen a gen PAM 002 that said 300m on the caseback ? If so, I would appreciate being guided in the right direction. Also refuses to provide high res images or a photo of the appropriate side of the watch card - pretty dodgy in my books. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jibuti 958 Posted February 24, 2019 Saw few pics on let say Paneristi, also Paneraisource and WUS few years ago... Yes... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
tonyh7 235 Posted February 24, 2019 Hard to tell with the watch, Pam reps so good. The box and warranty card do look shit though. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jibuti 958 Posted February 24, 2019 I can only say again that OP I cal. looks gen. If it is pic from same watch. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites