BadPickle 2,746 Posted April 21, 2021 9 hours ago, deju said: Have you ever felt a watch has been limited to too high a production number ?! who the hell is black panther? Even in super hero circles he’s gotta be z-list Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Aramis2288 6,253 Posted April 21, 2021 (edited) Holy shite, they multiply!!! This one is only 7,5k though! Somebody hold my beer, gotta search for some spare change! Edited April 21, 2021 by Aramis2288 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
thejudge 29 Posted May 7, 2021 So they are making 250 of these how many do you think will end up being bought by NBA/NFL/MLB players 50%?, 75%? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Aramis2288 6,253 Posted May 7, 2021 12 minutes ago, thejudge said: So they are making 250 of these how many do you think will end up being bought by NBA/NFL/MLB players 50%?, 75%? I think it's so ugly they can take 'em all. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jowill923 23 Posted June 15, 2021 TF is this thing? AP will make literally anything these days; sad to see! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Griffo 6 Posted June 16, 2021 Is this AP doing a collab with Invicta?! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Zarbus 138 Posted June 16, 2021 I have mixed feelings about this watch. On the one hand it's clearly a very strange collab. We could argue that they are weakening the AP brand etc.. Also it's clearly a loud watch, and it's crazy expensive for what can be seen as just a comics/superhero "kids" watch. On the other hand it well made and apparently it's sold out. We need to keep in mind that AP is competing with Richard Mille and needs to appeal to younger generations etc.. I don't know, maybe it's a marketing stunt to have people talk about them on Social Media. People are immediately rejecting this watch, and from a brand perspective, strong emotions is better than no emotions at all. At the end of the day it's not like if they were replacing ALL the other Royal Oaks by this. It's an experiment and we should applaud them for that. We keep complaining that Rolex never innovates, but we also complain when a brand shows something new that is ugly to our eyes. To me this watch remind me of a Jeff Koon scuplture. You may not like it, you may think it's overpriced or has no place in an art gallery... But it makes us reconsider what is art. Would we react the same way if it was a $200 Casio watch? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Horace Derwent 797 Posted June 18, 2021 Ahahah, First the Code 12.59 (stupidiest name EVER for a watch) which is this thing that sold nothing and was a flop Then this Marvel Royal Oak....cmon guys , AP is flogging a dead horse since too many years . Their prices are absolutely enormous and unallpealing, ...even offensive, since the cheapest Royal Oak in steel costs near 20.000 $. Incredible to me that the cheapest AP is way more expensive than a Breguet,a Blancpain,a Piaget...even A.Lange Sohne is cheaper than AP. Call me unpopular, but AP is right now one of the more overpriced Brands out there. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
