Jump to content
Theonewatches

Oyster Perpetual 124300 (41mm) GEN, VS & Clean Comprehensive Comparison

Recommended Posts

Theonewatches

Hello, everyone, This is Steve and I am back

A few months ago we did a comparison of Oyster Perpetuals, but unfortunately the timing wasn't right, shortly after the post was published, VS released Oyster Perpetual, and at the time I was thinking that Clean would release as well,

after all, the two top factories are competing on many models, and seeing as how VSF went into Oyster Perpetuals,

how could Clean not stay still, As expected, Clean followed suit with Oyster Perpetual. So let's take a look at this territory today and see who gets a head start.

Front Dial View

58f9e273.jpg

31d47351.jpg

Light View
5ffce06d.jpg
I will not comment on the colour, you can compare yourself, in the case of the existence of colour differences, it depends on personal preference, you think which one is more comfortable, then choose which one is right.

After all, the level of detail of the two factories we all know very well, and then how, but also not to the point of difference.

Bezel View

30b371fb.jpg

01125149.jpg

0c894c3a.jpg

3d67345c.jpg

The edges of VS don't make a rounded transition and are a bit too sharp, clean does a good job.

As we can see in Figure 4 below, Gen's bezel is beyond the center shell, and VSF has a significant protrusion that is close to the width of Gen , while Clean protrudes only slightly.

Crystal Side View

f53e45b4.jpg

4646f9eb.jpg
The edges vary, Clean chamfer is adequate but seems to be layered a bit too much, whereas VSF has always been the same, with only a rounded transition on the outer edges.

Crown and Stick View

f2f432c0.jpg

2cf15ab5.jpg

5e315d19.jpg

2af6aedc.jpg

5248c7b8.jpg

b157906c.jpg
The surface of VS Crown is a little dirty, but that should be an isolated problem, mainly because the edges are not rounded, while Clean still maintains excellent detail. There is no such thing as a good or bad stick.
 
Hands Luminous Fill View

f081bcbc.jpg

9b9300a8.jpg
Both factory are nice and grainy,the same as gen.

Oil Front View

3bdbce34.jpg

db73c43a.jpg

1913d6fb.jpg

de1cfacb.jpg

af9a520d.jpg

23402af2.jpg
Oil printing has always been the strong point of two factories, regularity and fullness are done very well, we can zoom in to compare, can find its three-dimensional sense of no less than Gen.

Middle Axis View

dc04a3f8.jpg

a3846380.jpg

5d7b65de.jpg
Both factories use solid Middle Axis , all in all, VS is not bad, but Clean is a little better, zoom in to see, VS surface has a little flaw, not flat enough, it seems that VS need to pay attention to the quality control of the parts.
 
Rehaut Side View

a0ab77e3.jpg

de913dc2.jpg
The clarity of two factories is almost the same, in the view Gen is a bit brighter, in reality the comparison is not so obvious.
  
Crown Side View

e0b25abb.jpg

b42be6e0.jpg

774c22e1.jpg
When the crown is in the winding position, the stem leaks out slightly differently, Gen leaks out only the threaded part. Both factories have smooth areas, but of course that doesn't matter.

Case Side View

13ca368a.jpg

2f0ac937.jpg
The shapes are all correct and the lugs are all curved in line with Gen
 
Caseback View

15a193ea.jpg
 2f174706.jpg


Endlink Side View

1aaf0a77.jpg

178964a8.jpg
Inside height difference is basically the same, outside curvature VS is a little better, Clean sinks too much.

Bracelet Details View

b0c6e948.jpg

40a48bd3.jpg

5caead6b.jpg

9eb1407b.jpg

a1db98d7.jpg

2d4efc08.jpg


Laser Mark View
52b676be.jpg
There is not much to comment on here, VS and Clean look quite similar in the dark.
 
Movement View

b2874913.jpg

0775c079.jpg
Due to the serious shortage of VS3230 movement, this year VS in many Rolex calendarless models, are equipped with the VS3235 movement released, Oyster Perpetual is the same, although the existence of the calendar vacant gear, but after all, the energy storage here, there are gains and losses, depending on the individual, and Clean is still equipped with the old acquaintance VR3230.
  
Data Comparison View

974327b3.jpg

a9ad650d.jpg

2f13c4f9.jpg
Note: All measurements are in a clamped state, and there may be tolerance due to slight deviations in the position of the caliper.

Well, this is today’s post, thank you guys for watching, if there are any mistakes, please correct me. If there is anything else I overlooked, you can put it up, and I will try my best to do it complementary and comprehensive, welcome to comment and exchange!

I will continue to bring you more detailed comparisons between replicas and GEN, which is for you guys to better choose your favorite replicas.

(Note: Some photos deviate from the real object due to the angle of the light. The details are mainly written in text. The size of the comparison picture is relatively large. You can download it and enlarge it for comparison.)

There is no perfect replica, only your favorite replica.

Thanks

Steve.

Website: https://www.theonewatches.ru

Telegram: u/Theonewatches_steve

WhatsApp: + 86-17081934955

Email: [email protected]

Edited by Theonewatches

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
richarddick

I have a gen (I hope!) and it's just crazy how accurate the reps are these days.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
richarddick

Is there a weight difference between them?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×