alias1 0 Posted August 12, 2011 Apart from the obvious subdial spacing, If you can find any flaws anything at all please let me know. Any feedback will be greatly appreciated. First the video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MHPJTpCALqA Thanks! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
therockerz 0 Posted August 12, 2011 (edited) Looks really nice Who are you getting it from, and how much is this setting you back by? (If you don't mind sharing) Enjoy it Edited August 12, 2011 by therockerz Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
g.man 0 Posted August 15, 2011 I'm anything but an expert, so perhaps someone else with better knowledge could confirm or deny this, but I've been given to understand that the gens don't have a flat crystal like this rep does. Still a lovely watch though. regards g.man Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
nunu78 1,741 Posted August 15, 2011 Looks really nice Who are you getting it from, and how much is this setting you back by? (If you don't mind sharing) Enjoy it I think it's from Lay aka replica make. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DarkGlass 83 Posted August 15, 2011 Very nice mate, no idea whatsoever if it's accurate or not, you must be pretty friendly to let people get that close ! Enjoy your new watch Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Luthier 1 Posted August 15, 2011 Strange 1st post... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SeanusMaximus 0 Posted August 15, 2011 Strange 1st post... By that you mean it wasn't the usual "FIND ME THIS" or "DOES IT LOOK REAL?" Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Archaon 4 Posted August 15, 2011 - the sapphire is not curved. - the white markers at 3, 6 and 9 are smaller than on the gen. - one of the subdials is just an hour hand repetition. Cheers. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Goon 0 Posted August 17, 2011 Far from an expert, so take what I say with a grain of salt: - The subdials are too far apart - The caseback is solid black on the gen - The bottom subdial just mirrors the hour hand. Several people have 'modded' this so it stays in the "12" position. No idea how they do that. - The glass isn't curved like the gen. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
greg_r 81 Posted August 17, 2011 In response to some of the comments in this thread, please go read this: http://www.replica-watches-guide.com/forum...showtopic=14317 However, to re-cap the salient point here. QC photos are NOT for deciding whether the watch looks like gen. That should be researched BEFORE ordering. Once the order has been placed, you are committed to buy provided the watch offered is the same spec as the watch ordered. QC photos are for checking that there are no obvious faults (i.e. marks on the crystal, hands fallen off, bracelet broken etc.) or divergences from the watch originally offered for sale nothing else. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wat44 0 Posted August 17, 2011 How many times does this need to be said? Posting QC pics to find flaws is not on! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
KeNnY 29 Posted August 17, 2011 Ps it looks nice! BTW I ordered an Omega moonie also from Robert, and Can't wait to get it.. An for the rep moonie, it looks great !You will be happy with it, just don't tell everyone that it is gen, because it is not. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
greg_r 81 Posted August 17, 2011 Ps it looks nice! +1 It has to be said that there is NO perfect 1:1 rep of the moonwatch, so this is as good as it gets. Buy it and enjoy! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Del 4,459 Posted August 17, 2011 I don't even think the OP has returned to read his thread. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
