Suspect?

[Dr Yan 8]

 

The fact that you're Irish means you won't have a clue B)

 

 

 

Very clever , I see what you're doing there, using the prejudiced and stereotypical portrayal of all irish people as stupid to infer that I too, am stupid.

Very clever indeed.

I bow to your superior intellect.

 

(BTW This is sarcasm, again)

[Baldrick 1]

Sarcasm....how would you KNOW

[powderfreak 0]

 

The fact that you're Irish means you won't have a clue B)

 

 

 

Very clever , I see what you're doing there, using the prejudiced and stereotypical portrayal of all irish people as stupid to infer that I too, am stupid.

Very clever indeed.

I bow to your superior intellect.

 

(BTW This is sarcasm, again)

 

 

No need to argue with him more than once, he does the same every time:

 

 

 

Okay Baldrick, we all get it:

 

1. You love to turn around what others said, until it suits you.

2. You are always right.

3. You know everything - if others do, too, you will know better.

 

[...]

[Baldrick 1]

You still smarting from the Ethel comment, huh Powder-puff :

[wat44 0]

B)

[SeanusMaximus 0]

[powderfreak 0]

You still smarting from the Ethel comment, huh Powder-puff :

 

Powder-puff says: Hello Balprick

 

 

 

Edit: Don't take it personal, I don't either

[Baldrick 1]

Good....I believe you, thousands wouldn't, BTW...are you officially following my posts now, ( I'm sure there's a button somewhere for that ). or is it just idle curiosity that prompts you to posts where I post

[sconehead 5]

tsssssssssssssssk...well I never ...children...

[Baldrick 1]

Where are these MIA under-shopped photos of yours..eh ?

 

First lesson for you Scunney regarding digital fotygrafy.

 

1. Contrary to what you believe, you do NOT need to buy film for the camera! B)

[sconehead 5]

Where are these MIA under-shopped photos of yours..eh ?

 

First lesson for you Scunney regarding digital fotygrafy.

 

1. Contrary to what you believe, you do NOT need to buy film for the camera! B)

 

 

shop this for me then...

DSC_0230a by sconehead12, on Flickr

[powderfreak 0]

Good....I believe you, thousands wouldn't, BTW...are you officially following my posts now, ( I'm sure there's a button somewhere for that ). or is it just idle curiosity that prompts you to posts where I post

 

Thanks

 

Aaahm, I dunno why it says I follow this thread, but it does, you're right! I didn't klick on the "follow" button and tbh I have recognized that before - it seems as if the new forum software automatically subscribes me to some threads (and unsubscribes, too!). Haven't yet found out why and when, but I suppose it must have something to do with me posting (+ including quotes?) or being quoted. Anyone who knows more about that?

[Baldrick 1]

Of course I'm right, I'm always right, or so you keep fondly telling me B)

 

@Scunnery......I'd have preferrred a photo that was at least in focus.....like this one.......!

 

 

what am I supposed to do with yours.....oh well since you insist !

 

PS.. let me be at pains to point out to you that ABSOLUTELY NO PHOTOSHOP WAS USED ON THIS.

[sconehead 5]

tssssssssssssk, you know I'm experimenting with natural light for a GC style 'look'...:P

[Baldrick 1]

Is that what they call 'lack of focus' it now...the GC look B)

 

PS ...it might work for GC...it isn't for you

 

PPS ...don't confuse LOF with bokeh,,..they are mutually exclusive. B)

[powderfreak 0]

Of course I'm right, I'm always right, or so you keep fondly telling me B)

 

Seeing Being and believing - big difference :P

 

On another matter: Gamma correction / gradation curve?

[Baldrick 1]

None of that.....!

 

Guess I'm right again...or is it that you're simply wrong again...as usual B)

 

Now, I'm going to choose to ignore you some other time. I have a plook on my arse which needs lancing, infinitely preferable to reading your jejune inanity, therefore I bid you adieu with rather less than a fond farewell B)