greg_r 83 Posted July 19, 2012 No, Ti case (nuthin' wrong with that IMO). Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
KinCaidk 0 Posted July 19, 2012 it will be better if you use it in the sea. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
trailboss99 996 Posted July 19, 2012 Too damn light. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
greg_r 83 Posted July 19, 2012 Too damn light. I kinda like that, TBH - my 177 is by far the most comfortable of my 44mm PAMs for that reason... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
KinCaidk 0 Posted July 19, 2012 Too damn light. that's what she said Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
seclark007 11 Posted July 19, 2012 This now has me reexamining Tudor....OP comment is bang on that they are more pleasing to the eye than anything coming out of Rolex lately Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jcagara08 31 Posted July 19, 2012 Sorry guys but it looks like a Seiko to me.. LOL Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Member X 91 Posted July 19, 2012 CHF3950, though - about £2.5k! Definitely more of a bargain than the Rolex Sub but still wayyyyy more than I have to play with lol Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
alex.cpa 1 Posted July 20, 2012 I quite like it. Almost as much s DSSD lol Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SeptemberSun 0 Posted January 20, 2014 Um yeah, I want to buy this. Have been sitting on a used IWC Aquatimer 3536 Titanium but I'm sorry, this looks better. Bonus time in 1 month, giddy up! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Member X 91 Posted January 20, 2014 Post pics if you do!! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
