greg_r 83 Posted April 26, 2010 Just a heads up. Josh has moved domains yet again. He can now be found here: http://www.1-pc8838.com/ Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
graman 2 Posted April 26, 2010 The man must be hunted! I see there are at least 2 scam sites that replicate his site as well... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GC 4,517 Posted April 26, 2010 "yet again"...is that a bad sign? I also get a strange warning at the top of the page saying: "WARNING: I am able to write to the configuration file:....this is a potential security risk..."? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SliceMaster 281 Posted April 26, 2010 "yet again"...is that a bad sign? I also get a strange warning at the top of the page saying: "WARNING: I am able to write to the configuration file:....this is a potential security risk..."? I got the same warning and dont know what that means....anyone knows?? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Luthier 1 Posted April 26, 2010 I got the same warning. No idea, what's that. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
greg_r 83 Posted April 26, 2010 The warning is for Josh - it means that he hasn't changed the permissions on the OSCommerce main configuration file after install. Let's hope he spots it before the hackers do. Silly boy Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
greg_r 83 Posted April 26, 2010 "yet again"...is that a bad sign? He seems to do this two or three times a year. I don't know whether he's paranoid or whether he's got Rolex chasing him. The odd bit is that he seems to stay on the same server - it's only the domain that changes... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rc42 0 Posted April 26, 2010 No doubt Andrew's site will be moving too (if it hasn't already) I guess that being siamese twins makes it difficult for one to move without the other noticing and following Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
AllergyDoc 40 Posted April 26, 2010 Josh will soon be out of lucky number combinations. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cybee 0 Posted April 26, 2010 Thanks for the update. I guess he hasnt made enough money to retire yet. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
sconehead 5 Posted April 26, 2010 The warning is for Josh - it means that he hasn't changed the permissions on the OSCommerce main configuration file after install. Let's hope he spots it before the hackers do. Silly boy Would it be safe to use your cc there then? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dmisgod 0 Posted April 26, 2010 the narcs are upon him, sadly Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ebzen02 341 Posted April 26, 2010 He is the Jacky Chang of reps.. "After all those years in Asia, I don't have to do promotion anymore. We just release a Jackie Chan rep and - Boom! - people go and buy them" and then when asked if he was sacred of the authorities try to hunt him down he says: Of course I'm scared. I'm not Superman. " "I'm crazy, but I'm not too crazy. " His thoughts on grown white men that need to lie to their wifes about buying repts: "Since the white man knew his wife would give in, he tried the same trick again and again." Parting thought about his competitors: "Don`t try to be like Jackie. There is only one Jackie. Study computers instead." Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
greg_r 83 Posted April 27, 2010 The warning is for Josh - it means that he hasn't changed the permissions on the OSCommerce main configuration file after install. Let's hope he spots it before the hackers do. Silly boy Would it be safe to use your cc there then? Yup should be - that's all SSL encrypted. The problem is just relating to a basic config file used to tell the site what domain it's on etc. Anyhow, Josh seems to have noticed and fixed it... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RolexAddict 1 Posted April 27, 2010 I have found this, seems to bee last valid infos : Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
greg_r 83 Posted April 27, 2010 uhm... and? Not sure what point you're trying to make here RA. Other than the name change, that's no different from any time in the past. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RolexAddict 1 Posted April 27, 2010 o.k, just to say its easy to localise somebody and attack. I could be wrong but one of my theory is that Josh is (almost) the only one who is chased by different authorities. His market is wider than rep watch board members. That's may be the reason. He sell a lot of reps to official institutions, and that has to disturb the Rolex comp. for exemple. A French paradox, as France is know to be the country of exceptions : in French movies all watches, guns, jewlery must to be reps. Producers and movie companies buy in any legality rep accessories, why not from Josh ? On all Swiss and French TV channels talk shows about counterfeit they have shown Josh and Andrew website home page. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
greg_r 83 Posted April 27, 2010 ah - okay. I'm with you. Yes, you may well be right. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Member X 91 Posted April 27, 2010 A French paradox, as France is know to be the country of exceptions :in French movies all watches, guns, jewlery must to be reps. Producers and movie companies buy in any legality rep accessories, why not from Josh ? I never knew that!! Why do they have that restriction? Is it product placement issues? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RolexAddict 1 Posted April 27, 2010 Josh sells rep Daytonas to our president, I have good sources, Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Baldrick 1 Posted April 27, 2010 I know I can't look at his site anymore, not because of the site moves, simply because I can't see the watches anymore for all the different watermarks on the photos Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
pollux1 3 Posted April 27, 2010 Those watermarks are getting out of hand, one or two would suffice. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
