GMT IIC on the bay

[Niles 0]

Hey guys...check out this GMT IIC on the bay. The rest of the watch looks gen but the date magnification just looks like it's not even close. The date looks way to small in multiple photos at multiple angles. What do you think?

 

http://www.ebay.com/itm/New-2013-Rolex-SS-GMT-Master-II-116710-116710BLNR-blueblack-ceramic-boxpapers-/261296706091

[diegosaenz 0]

Hmmm... I'll let the experts chime in.

[Odyseus 1]

Looks gen to me!! - as I'm pretty sure that the GMT hand is above the hour hand (As it should be)

[TheInthusiest 0]

GEN. Everything looks great on the piece.

 

Plus, i know this store. They are very legitimate.

[Niles 0]

Like I said guys, literally everything else on the watch looks legit except the date mag. That thing is just not gen. I can even see the laser etched crown in the photos. I've seen reps with better mag than that.

[Grimmi 1]

looks gen to me...

To me the date mag looks fine and remember that the laser etched crown can barely be seen... It's on the reps that it's way too pronounced.

That's what I think anyway..

[Rolexwatchman 0]

watch is fine you can pick it up at the store.

[moredhel 0]

The crystal mag looks rather off for me too.

 

Here's the ebay one:

 

Here's one from another site:

[moredhel 0]

And another with the dw at 9 for comparison:

 

 

From Chrono24:

[moredhel 0]

Everything else looks spot on though.

 

If this is the new range of GMTIIc reps I want one!

[Rolexwatchman 0]

the lighting, pictures angles and everything plays in this part. But its sure a genuine watch.

[paristango 0]

Interesting, it looks fake to me too. The cyclops look horrible

[jgoorn 0]

If in doubt buy from someone else. You aren't being forced to purchase from one dealer.