Conex 0 Posted May 13, 2014 Fashion is what you are comfortable wearing and not what others tell you :yiddishe: I'd say that was 'Style' rather than fashion, but that's just semantics I guess. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Conex 0 Posted May 13, 2014 Divers are casual watches, not formal attire. 007 wearing a Seamaster to a formal event is stupid; us mere mortals doing something similar is equally stupid. I wouldn't take it too seriously mate. 1)Bond is not real 2)Omega would have decided what he wore Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hornet 1 Posted May 13, 2014 Fashion is what you are comfortable wearing and not what others tell you :yiddishe: I'd say that was 'Style' rather than fashion, but that's just semantics I guess. +1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hornet 1 Posted May 13, 2014 Divers are casual watches, not formal attire. 007 wearing a Seamaster to a formal event is stupid; us mere mortals doing something similar is equally stupid. Who decided that you couldn't wear a divers watch to a formal event?! And for anyone else who really cares read these links: http://www.wikihow.com/Wear-a-Watch http://www.ablogtowatch.com/ask-watch-experts/what-are-watch-wearing-style-rules/ http://www.gq.com/style/style-guy/accessories/200102/wrist-watch http://mensfashion.about.com/od/watches/tp/Mens_Watch_Guide.htm .....loads of bollocks really, as I wear the watch I feeling like wearing, not what goes with my pants and sock..... ......just thought that some more crap from the web would fire things up again. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Conex 0 Posted May 13, 2014 Divers are casual watches, not formal attire. 007 wearing a Seamaster to a formal event is stupid; us mere mortals doing something similar is equally stupid. Who decided that you couldn't wear a divers watch to a formal event?! And for anyone else who really cares read these links: http://www.wikihow.com/Wear-a-Watch http://www.ablogtowa...ng-style-rules/ http://www.gq.com/st...102/wrist-watch http://mensfashion.a...Watch_Guide.htm .....loads of bollocks really, as I wear the watch I feeling like wearing, not what goes with my pants and sock..... ......just thought that some more crap from the web would fire things up again. Wholeheartedly agree. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DR3M3L 4 Posted May 13, 2014 Divers are casual watches, not formal attire. 007 wearing a Seamaster to a formal event is stupid; us mere mortals doing something similar is equally stupid. Who decided that you couldn't wear a divers watch to a formal event?! And for anyone else who really cares read these links: http://www.wikihow.com/Wear-a-Watch http://www.ablogtowa...ng-style-rules/ http://www.gq.com/st...102/wrist-watch http://mensfashion.a...Watch_Guide.htm .....loads of bollocks really, as I wear the watch I feeling like wearing, not what goes with my pants and sock..... ......just thought that some more crap from the web would fire things up again. Wholeheartedly agree. Makes 3 of us. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hornet 1 Posted May 13, 2014 Divers are casual watches, not formal attire. 007 wearing a Seamaster to a formal event is stupid; us mere mortals doing something similar is equally stupid. Who decided that you couldn't wear a divers watch to a formal event?! And for anyone else who really cares read these links: http://www.wikihow.com/Wear-a-Watch http://www.ablogtowa...ng-style-rules/ http://www.gq.com/st...102/wrist-watch http://mensfashion.a...Watch_Guide.htm .....loads of bollocks really, as I wear the watch I feeling like wearing, not what goes with my pants and sock..... ......just thought that some more crap from the web would fire things up again. Wholeheartedly agree. Makes 3 of us. Why thank you gents! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
J!m 289 Posted May 13, 2014 I think a serious misconception is that "expensive" watches are "formal" watches. But, this is not the case. A sub is a sports watch- appropriate with a polo shirt for example, doing outdoors sporty crap. Regardless of the fact that is cost you seven grand (or more?), it is not appropriate for wear with a jacket, and absolutely not appropriate with a jacket and tie. I think the worst idea ever conceived was when Rolex decided o make the sub in gold. I think that was the beginning of the end for the dresss/sport watch clear line of demarcation. The only expection to this would be if you were an endorcee of the watch brand, and "tied" to a particular model from them. In this case, when in public, you would be expected to be wearing a particular watch. If you must wear Rolex, an Air-King is far more appropriate than a sub, regardless of cost, in a more formal setting. If you have a leather band on your watch, I think it is in good taste to have the material match- shoes and belt should match anyway, (I hope you're not that guy with a red-brown belt and black shoes?) take it to the next level and have a matching watch strap. For all the mniscule details we all obsess over with reps, it is amazing that so little care goes into one's own appearance. If nothing else, it is an excuse to get yet another watch strap or complete watch! Metals should match. Silver/stainless/platinum/rhodium are all close enough to me to be interchangable. Non-plated white gold tends to look a bit warmer, so you might want a better match here. Yellow and rose gold should be worn together. Ring(s), cuff links etc. (allthough there should not be much in the way of "etc." in my opinion) should be the same metal. Someone else said: wedding ring and watch, much more is pushing it in the men's jewelry department... I wear a white gold band and my watches are all stainless. The ring is a bit warmer now that the rhodium is gone, but it works well enough. Tuxedo? Pocket watch. WAY classier, and a vintage piece really brings it home. I carried my Grandfather's Hamilton for my wedding... I never understood precious gems on a watch either. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DR3M3L 4 Posted May 13, 2014 I think a serious misconception is that "expensive" watches are "formal" watches. But, this is not the case. A sub is a sports watch- appropriate with a polo shirt for example, doing outdoors sporty crap. Regardless of the fact that is cost you seven grand (or more?), it is not appropriate for wear with a jacket, and absolutely not appropriate with a jacket and tie. I think the worst idea ever conceived was when Rolex decided o make the sub in gold. I think that was the beginning of the end for the dresss/sport watch clear line of demarcation. The only expection to this would be if you were an endorcee of the watch brand, and "tied" to a particular model from them. In this case, when in public, you would be expected to be wearing a particular watch. If you must wear Rolex, an Air-King is far more appropriate than a sub, regardless of cost, in a more formal setting. If you have a leather band on your watch, I think it is in good taste to have the material match- shoes and belt should match anyway, (I hope you're not that guy with a red-brown belt and black shoes?) take it to the next level and have a matching watch strap. For all the mniscule details we all obsess over with reps, it is amazing that so little care goes into one's own appearance. If nothing else, it is an excuse to get yet another watch strap or complete watch! Metals should match. Silver/stainless/platinum/rhodium are all close enough to me to be interchangable. Non-plated white gold tends to look a bit warmer, so you might want a better match here. Yellow and rose gold should be worn together. Ring(s), cuff links etc. (allthough there should not be much in the way of "etc." in my opinion) should be the same metal. Someone else said: wedding ring and watch, much more is pushing it in the men's jewelry department... I wear a white gold band and my watches are all stainless. The ring is a bit warmer now that the rhodium is gone, but it works well enough. Tuxedo? Pocket watch. WAY classier, and a vintage piece really brings it home. I carried my Grandfather's Hamilton for my wedding... I never understood precious gems on a watch either. bravo! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ice_Man 0 Posted May 13, 2014 I think a serious misconception is that "expensive" watches are "formal" watches. But, this is not the case. A sub is a sports watch- appropriate with a polo shirt for example, doing outdoors sporty crap. Regardless of the fact that is cost you seven grand (or more?), it is not appropriate for wear with a jacket, and absolutely not appropriate with a jacket and tie. I think the worst idea ever conceived was when Rolex decided o make the sub in gold. I think that was the beginning of the end for the dresss/sport watch clear line of demarcation. The only expection to this would be if you were an endorcee of the watch brand, and "tied" to a particular model from them. In this case, when in public, you would be expected to be wearing a particular watch. If you must wear Rolex, an Air-King is far more appropriate than a sub, regardless of cost, in a more formal setting. If you have a leather band on your watch, I think it is in good taste to have the material match- shoes and belt should match anyway, (I hope you're not that guy with a red-brown belt and black shoes?) take it to the next level and have a matching watch strap. For all the mniscule details we all obsess over with reps, it is amazing that so little care goes into one's own appearance. If nothing else, it is an excuse to get yet another watch strap or complete watch! Metals should match. Silver/stainless/platinum/rhodium are all close enough to me to be interchangable. Non-plated white gold tends to look a bit warmer, so you might want a better match here. Yellow and rose gold should be worn together. Ring(s), cuff links etc. (allthough there should not be much in the way of "etc." in my opinion) should be the same metal. Someone else said: wedding ring and watch, much more is pushing it in the men's jewelry department... I wear a white gold band and my watches are all stainless. The ring is a bit warmer now that the rhodium is gone, but it works well enough. Tuxedo? Pocket watch. WAY classier, and a vintage piece really brings it home. I carried my Grandfather's Hamilton for my wedding... I never understood precious gems on a watch either. Thank you sir, put that in better words than I could hence why I was crucified for my OP. Glad to know someone has the same viewpoint. On the other hand, last time I make a thought provoking thread thats turns into pages of bickering. I guess I just stick to "hey which one of these should I buy" threads haha Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hornet 1 Posted May 13, 2014 I think a serious misconception is that "expensive" watches are "formal" watches. But, this is not the case. A sub is a sports watch- appropriate with a polo shirt for example, doing outdoors sporty crap. Regardless of the fact that is cost you seven grand (or more?), it is not appropriate for wear with a jacket, and absolutely not appropriate with a jacket and tie. I think the worst idea ever conceived was when Rolex decided o make the sub in gold. I think that was the beginning of the end for the dresss/sport watch clear line of demarcation. The only expection to this would be if you were an endorcee of the watch brand, and "tied" to a particular model from them. In this case, when in public, you would be expected to be wearing a particular watch. If you must wear Rolex, an Air-King is far more appropriate than a sub, regardless of cost, in a more formal setting. If you have a leather band on your watch, I think it is in good taste to have the material match- shoes and belt should match anyway, (I hope you're not that guy with a red-brown belt and black shoes?) take it to the next level and have a matching watch strap. For all the mniscule details we all obsess over with reps, it is amazing that so little care goes into one's own appearance. If nothing else, it is an excuse to get yet another watch strap or complete watch! Metals should match. Silver/stainless/platinum/rhodium are all close enough to me to be interchangable. Non-plated white gold tends to look a bit warmer, so you might want a better match here. Yellow and rose gold should be worn together. Ring(s), cuff links etc. (allthough there should not be much in the way of "etc." in my opinion) should be the same metal. Someone else said: wedding ring and watch, much more is pushing it in the men's jewelry department... I wear a white gold band and my watches are all stainless. The ring is a bit warmer now that the rhodium is gone, but it works well enough. Tuxedo? Pocket watch. WAY classier, and a vintage piece really brings it home. I carried my Grandfather's Hamilton for my wedding... I never understood precious gems on a watch either. You're thinking about this waaaaaaay too much..... ......none of my friends judge me on whether my watch and outfit match and where I work no one would judge me on my watch, let along whether it matches my shoes; I'm judged on my performance (which is a bummer, if they judged me on my Pam it'd be bonus central....!). Just to point out I do take care of my appearance clothes-wise, but just not to this level! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hornet 1 Posted May 13, 2014 I think a serious misconception is that "expensive" watches are "formal" watches. But, this is not the case. A sub is a sports watch- appropriate with a polo shirt for example, doing outdoors sporty crap. Regardless of the fact that is cost you seven grand (or more?), it is not appropriate for wear with a jacket, and absolutely not appropriate with a jacket and tie. I think the worst idea ever conceived was when Rolex decided o make the sub in gold. I think that was the beginning of the end for the dresss/sport watch clear line of demarcation. The only expection to this would be if you were an endorcee of the watch brand, and "tied" to a particular model from them. In this case, when in public, you would be expected to be wearing a particular watch. If you must wear Rolex, an Air-King is far more appropriate than a sub, regardless of cost, in a more formal setting. If you have a leather band on your watch, I think it is in good taste to have the material match- shoes and belt should match anyway, (I hope you're not that guy with a red-brown belt and black shoes?) take it to the next level and have a matching watch strap. For all the mniscule details we all obsess over with reps, it is amazing that so little care goes into one's own appearance. If nothing else, it is an excuse to get yet another watch strap or complete watch! Metals should match. Silver/stainless/platinum/rhodium are all close enough to me to be interchangable. Non-plated white gold tends to look a bit warmer, so you might want a better match here. Yellow and rose gold should be worn together. Ring(s), cuff links etc. (allthough there should not be much in the way of "etc." in my opinion) should be the same metal. Someone else said: wedding ring and watch, much more is pushing it in the men's jewelry department... I wear a white gold band and my watches are all stainless. The ring is a bit warmer now that the rhodium is gone, but it works well enough. Tuxedo? Pocket watch. WAY classier, and a vintage piece really brings it home. I carried my Grandfather's Hamilton for my wedding... I never understood precious gems on a watch either. Thank you sir, put that in better words than I could hence why I was crucified for my OP. Glad to know someone has the same viewpoint. On the other hand, last time I make a thought provoking thread thats turns into pages of bickering. I guess I just stick to "hey which one of these should I buy" threads haha Hey Iceman, don't get disheartened! You've got people out there who think the same as you and care about this as much as you..... .....and others who don't. You've started a good thread here, but remember with polarizing topics like this they generally descend into bickering! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Beefalope 0 Posted May 13, 2014 I think a serious misconception is that "expensive" watches are "formal" watches. But, this is not the case. A sub is a sports watch- appropriate with a polo shirt for example, doing outdoors sporty crap. Regardless of the fact that is cost you seven grand (or more?), it is not appropriate for wear with a jacket, and absolutely not appropriate with a jacket and tie. I think the worst idea ever conceived was when Rolex decided o make the sub in gold. I think that was the beginning of the end for the dresss/sport watch clear line of demarcation. The only expection to this would be if you were an endorcee of the watch brand, and "tied" to a particular model from them. In this case, when in public, you would be expected to be wearing a particular watch. If you must wear Rolex, an Air-King is far more appropriate than a sub, regardless of cost, in a more formal setting. If you have a leather band on your watch, I think it is in good taste to have the material match- shoes and belt should match anyway, (I hope you're not that guy with a red-brown belt and black shoes?) take it to the next level and have a matching watch strap. For all the mniscule details we all obsess over with reps, it is amazing that so little care goes into one's own appearance. If nothing else, it is an excuse to get yet another watch strap or complete watch! Metals should match. Silver/stainless/platinum/rhodium are all close enough to me to be interchangable. Non-plated white gold tends to look a bit warmer, so you might want a better match here. Yellow and rose gold should be worn together. Ring(s), cuff links etc. (allthough there should not be much in the way of "etc." in my opinion) should be the same metal. Someone else said: wedding ring and watch, much more is pushing it in the men's jewelry department... I wear a white gold band and my watches are all stainless. The ring is a bit warmer now that the rhodium is gone, but it works well enough. Tuxedo? Pocket watch. WAY classier, and a vintage piece really brings it home. I carried my Grandfather's Hamilton for my wedding... I never understood precious gems on a watch either. Thank you sir, put that in better words than I could hence why I was crucified for my OP. Glad to know someone has the same viewpoint. On the other hand, last time I make a thought provoking thread thats turns into pages of bickering. I guess I just stick to "hey which one of these should I buy" threads haha Hey Iceman, don't get disheartened! You've got people out there who think the same as you and care about this as much as you..... .....and others who don't. You've started a good thread here, but remember with polarizing topics like this they generally descend into bickering! Without bickering, I will say that I generally agree with Jim's point that Subs -- and other divers -- are not ideal as formal wear. Divers generally have busy designs, and that lends itself well to being a sport watch because a busy design attracts more attention. Formal watches, on the other hand, are more simple, and they're meant to blend into your overall outfit. Who decides? Well, I decide. Obviously, this is my personal opinion. People are free to agree or disagree with it. I'm not trying to make a general statement on fashion trends because, frankly, I don't give a shit about that kind of thing. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hornet 1 Posted May 13, 2014 I think a serious misconception is that "expensive" watches are "formal" watches. But, this is not the case. A sub is a sports watch- appropriate with a polo shirt for example, doing outdoors sporty crap. Regardless of the fact that is cost you seven grand (or more?), it is not appropriate for wear with a jacket, and absolutely not appropriate with a jacket and tie. I think the worst idea ever conceived was when Rolex decided o make the sub in gold. I think that was the beginning of the end for the dresss/sport watch clear line of demarcation. The only expection to this would be if you were an endorcee of the watch brand, and "tied" to a particular model from them. In this case, when in public, you would be expected to be wearing a particular watch. If you must wear Rolex, an Air-King is far more appropriate than a sub, regardless of cost, in a more formal setting. If you have a leather band on your watch, I think it is in good taste to have the material match- shoes and belt should match anyway, (I hope you're not that guy with a red-brown belt and black shoes?) take it to the next level and have a matching watch strap. For all the mniscule details we all obsess over with reps, it is amazing that so little care goes into one's own appearance. If nothing else, it is an excuse to get yet another watch strap or complete watch! Metals should match. Silver/stainless/platinum/rhodium are all close enough to me to be interchangable. Non-plated white gold tends to look a bit warmer, so you might want a better match here. Yellow and rose gold should be worn together. Ring(s), cuff links etc. (allthough there should not be much in the way of "etc." in my opinion) should be the same metal. Someone else said: wedding ring and watch, much more is pushing it in the men's jewelry department... I wear a white gold band and my watches are all stainless. The ring is a bit warmer now that the rhodium is gone, but it works well enough. Tuxedo? Pocket watch. WAY classier, and a vintage piece really brings it home. I carried my Grandfather's Hamilton for my wedding... I never understood precious gems on a watch either. Thank you sir, put that in better words than I could hence why I was crucified for my OP. Glad to know someone has the same viewpoint. On the other hand, last time I make a thought provoking thread thats turns into pages of bickering. I guess I just stick to "hey which one of these should I buy" threads haha Hey Iceman, don't get disheartened! You've got people out there who think the same as you and care about this as much as you..... .....and others who don't. You've started a good thread here, but remember with polarizing topics like this they generally descend into bickering! Without bickering, I will say that I generally agree with Jim's point that Subs -- and other divers -- are not ideal as formal wear. Divers generally have busy designs, and that lends itself well to being a sport watch because a busy design attracts more attention. Formal watches, on the other hand, are more simple, and they're meant to blend into your overall outfit. Who decides? Well, I decide. Obviously, this is my personal opinion. People are free to agree or disagree with it. I'm not trying to make a general statement on fashion trends because, frankly, I don't give a shit about that kind of thing. Does anyone wear any of their 'sports' watches whilst doing any sporting activities?! I wouldn't wear my PO swimming, it ain't that water proof and I'd not wear it rock climbing as it would get scratched to fuck! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Beefalope 0 Posted May 13, 2014 I think a serious misconception is that "expensive" watches are "formal" watches. But, this is not the case. A sub is a sports watch- appropriate with a polo shirt for example, doing outdoors sporty crap. Regardless of the fact that is cost you seven grand (or more?), it is not appropriate for wear with a jacket, and absolutely not appropriate with a jacket and tie. I think the worst idea ever conceived was when Rolex decided o make the sub in gold. I think that was the beginning of the end for the dresss/sport watch clear line of demarcation. The only expection to this would be if you were an endorcee of the watch brand, and "tied" to a particular model from them. In this case, when in public, you would be expected to be wearing a particular watch. If you must wear Rolex, an Air-King is far more appropriate than a sub, regardless of cost, in a more formal setting. If you have a leather band on your watch, I think it is in good taste to have the material match- shoes and belt should match anyway, (I hope you're not that guy with a red-brown belt and black shoes?) take it to the next level and have a matching watch strap. For all the mniscule details we all obsess over with reps, it is amazing that so little care goes into one's own appearance. If nothing else, it is an excuse to get yet another watch strap or complete watch! Metals should match. Silver/stainless/platinum/rhodium are all close enough to me to be interchangable. Non-plated white gold tends to look a bit warmer, so you might want a better match here. Yellow and rose gold should be worn together. Ring(s), cuff links etc. (allthough there should not be much in the way of "etc." in my opinion) should be the same metal. Someone else said: wedding ring and watch, much more is pushing it in the men's jewelry department... I wear a white gold band and my watches are all stainless. The ring is a bit warmer now that the rhodium is gone, but it works well enough. Tuxedo? Pocket watch. WAY classier, and a vintage piece really brings it home. I carried my Grandfather's Hamilton for my wedding... I never understood precious gems on a watch either. Thank you sir, put that in better words than I could hence why I was crucified for my OP. Glad to know someone has the same viewpoint. On the other hand, last time I make a thought provoking thread thats turns into pages of bickering. I guess I just stick to "hey which one of these should I buy" threads haha Hey Iceman, don't get disheartened! You've got people out there who think the same as you and care about this as much as you..... .....and others who don't. You've started a good thread here, but remember with polarizing topics like this they generally descend into bickering! Without bickering, I will say that I generally agree with Jim's point that Subs -- and other divers -- are not ideal as formal wear. Divers generally have busy designs, and that lends itself well to being a sport watch because a busy design attracts more attention. Formal watches, on the other hand, are more simple, and they're meant to blend into your overall outfit. Who decides? Well, I decide. Obviously, this is my personal opinion. People are free to agree or disagree with it. I'm not trying to make a general statement on fashion trends because, frankly, I don't give a shit about that kind of thing. Does anyone wear any of their 'sports' watches whilst doing any sporting activities?! I wouldn't wear my PO swimming, it ain't that water proof and I'd not wear it rock climbing as it would get scratched to fuck! I once wore my PO while fucking. Is that a sporting activity? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Kleen™ 45 Posted May 13, 2014 I think a serious misconception is that "expensive" watches are "formal" watches. But, this is not the case. A sub is a sports watch- appropriate with a polo shirt for example, doing outdoors sporty crap. Regardless of the fact that is cost you seven grand (or more?), it is not appropriate for wear with a jacket, and absolutely not appropriate with a jacket and tie. I think the worst idea ever conceived was when Rolex decided o make the sub in gold. I think that was the beginning of the end for the dresss/sport watch clear line of demarcation. The only expection to this would be if you were an endorcee of the watch brand, and "tied" to a particular model from them. In this case, when in public, you would be expected to be wearing a particular watch. If you must wear Rolex, an Air-King is far more appropriate than a sub, regardless of cost, in a more formal setting. If you have a leather band on your watch, I think it is in good taste to have the material match- shoes and belt should match anyway, (I hope you're not that guy with a red-brown belt and black shoes?) take it to the next level and have a matching watch strap. For all the mniscule details we all obsess over with reps, it is amazing that so little care goes into one's own appearance. If nothing else, it is an excuse to get yet another watch strap or complete watch! Metals should match. Silver/stainless/platinum/rhodium are all close enough to me to be interchangable. Non-plated white gold tends to look a bit warmer, so you might want a better match here. Yellow and rose gold should be worn together. Ring(s), cuff links etc. (allthough there should not be much in the way of "etc." in my opinion) should be the same metal. Someone else said: wedding ring and watch, much more is pushing it in the men's jewelry department... I wear a white gold band and my watches are all stainless. The ring is a bit warmer now that the rhodium is gone, but it works well enough. Tuxedo? Pocket watch. WAY classier, and a vintage piece really brings it home. I carried my Grandfather's Hamilton for my wedding... I never understood precious gems on a watch either. Thank you sir, put that in better words than I could hence why I was crucified for my OP. Glad to know someone has the same viewpoint. On the other hand, last time I make a thought provoking thread thats turns into pages of bickering. I guess I just stick to "hey which one of these should I buy" threads haha Hey Iceman, don't get disheartened! You've got people out there who think the same as you and care about this as much as you..... .....and others who don't. You've started a good thread here, but remember with polarizing topics like this they generally descend into bickering! Without bickering, I will say that I generally agree with Jim's point that Subs -- and other divers -- are not ideal as formal wear. Divers generally have busy designs, and that lends itself well to being a sport watch because a busy design attracts more attention. Formal watches, on the other hand, are more simple, and they're meant to blend into your overall outfit. Who decides? Well, I decide. Obviously, this is my personal opinion. People are free to agree or disagree with it. I'm not trying to make a general statement on fashion trends because, frankly, I don't give a shit about that kind of thing. Does anyone wear any of their 'sports' watches whilst doing any sporting activities?! I wouldn't wear my PO swimming, it ain't that water proof and I'd not wear it rock climbing as it would get scratched to fuck! I once wore my PO while fucking. Is that a sporting activity? No. So you and your boyfriend can relax... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hornet 1 Posted May 13, 2014 I think a serious misconception is that "expensive" watches are "formal" watches. But, this is not the case. A sub is a sports watch- appropriate with a polo shirt for example, doing outdoors sporty crap. Regardless of the fact that is cost you seven grand (or more?), it is not appropriate for wear with a jacket, and absolutely not appropriate with a jacket and tie. I think the worst idea ever conceived was when Rolex decided o make the sub in gold. I think that was the beginning of the end for the dresss/sport watch clear line of demarcation. The only expection to this would be if you were an endorcee of the watch brand, and "tied" to a particular model from them. In this case, when in public, you would be expected to be wearing a particular watch. If you must wear Rolex, an Air-King is far more appropriate than a sub, regardless of cost, in a more formal setting. If you have a leather band on your watch, I think it is in good taste to have the material match- shoes and belt should match anyway, (I hope you're not that guy with a red-brown belt and black shoes?) take it to the next level and have a matching watch strap. For all the mniscule details we all obsess over with reps, it is amazing that so little care goes into one's own appearance. If nothing else, it is an excuse to get yet another watch strap or complete watch! Metals should match. Silver/stainless/platinum/rhodium are all close enough to me to be interchangable. Non-plated white gold tends to look a bit warmer, so you might want a better match here. Yellow and rose gold should be worn together. Ring(s), cuff links etc. (allthough there should not be much in the way of "etc." in my opinion) should be the same metal. Someone else said: wedding ring and watch, much more is pushing it in the men's jewelry department... I wear a white gold band and my watches are all stainless. The ring is a bit warmer now that the rhodium is gone, but it works well enough. Tuxedo? Pocket watch. WAY classier, and a vintage piece really brings it home. I carried my Grandfather's Hamilton for my wedding... I never understood precious gems on a watch either. Thank you sir, put that in better words than I could hence why I was crucified for my OP. Glad to know someone has the same viewpoint. On the other hand, last time I make a thought provoking thread thats turns into pages of bickering. I guess I just stick to "hey which one of these should I buy" threads haha Hey Iceman, don't get disheartened! You've got people out there who think the same as you and care about this as much as you..... .....and others who don't. You've started a good thread here, but remember with polarizing topics like this they generally descend into bickering! Without bickering, I will say that I generally agree with Jim's point that Subs -- and other divers -- are not ideal as formal wear. Divers generally have busy designs, and that lends itself well to being a sport watch because a busy design attracts more attention. Formal watches, on the other hand, are more simple, and they're meant to blend into your overall outfit. Who decides? Well, I decide. Obviously, this is my personal opinion. People are free to agree or disagree with it. I'm not trying to make a general statement on fashion trends because, frankly, I don't give a shit about that kind of thing. Does anyone wear any of their 'sports' watches whilst doing any sporting activities?! I wouldn't wear my PO swimming, it ain't that water proof and I'd not wear it rock climbing as it would get scratched to fuck! I once wore my PO while fucking. Is that a sporting activity? Qualifies in my book mate, but where were you wearing it? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hornet 1 Posted May 13, 2014 I think a serious misconception is that "expensive" watches are "formal" watches. But, this is not the case. A sub is a sports watch- appropriate with a polo shirt for example, doing outdoors sporty crap. Regardless of the fact that is cost you seven grand (or more?), it is not appropriate for wear with a jacket, and absolutely not appropriate with a jacket and tie. I think the worst idea ever conceived was when Rolex decided o make the sub in gold. I think that was the beginning of the end for the dresss/sport watch clear line of demarcation. The only expection to this would be if you were an endorcee of the watch brand, and "tied" to a particular model from them. In this case, when in public, you would be expected to be wearing a particular watch. If you must wear Rolex, an Air-King is far more appropriate than a sub, regardless of cost, in a more formal setting. If you have a leather band on your watch, I think it is in good taste to have the material match- shoes and belt should match anyway, (I hope you're not that guy with a red-brown belt and black shoes?) take it to the next level and have a matching watch strap. For all the mniscule details we all obsess over with reps, it is amazing that so little care goes into one's own appearance. If nothing else, it is an excuse to get yet another watch strap or complete watch! Metals should match. Silver/stainless/platinum/rhodium are all close enough to me to be interchangable. Non-plated white gold tends to look a bit warmer, so you might want a better match here. Yellow and rose gold should be worn together. Ring(s), cuff links etc. (allthough there should not be much in the way of "etc." in my opinion) should be the same metal. Someone else said: wedding ring and watch, much more is pushing it in the men's jewelry department... I wear a white gold band and my watches are all stainless. The ring is a bit warmer now that the rhodium is gone, but it works well enough. Tuxedo? Pocket watch. WAY classier, and a vintage piece really brings it home. I carried my Grandfather's Hamilton for my wedding... I never understood precious gems on a watch either. Thank you sir, put that in better words than I could hence why I was crucified for my OP. Glad to know someone has the same viewpoint. On the other hand, last time I make a thought provoking thread thats turns into pages of bickering. I guess I just stick to "hey which one of these should I buy" threads haha Hey Iceman, don't get disheartened! You've got people out there who think the same as you and care about this as much as you..... .....and others who don't. You've started a good thread here, but remember with polarizing topics like this they generally descend into bickering! Without bickering, I will say that I generally agree with Jim's point that Subs -- and other divers -- are not ideal as formal wear. Divers generally have busy designs, and that lends itself well to being a sport watch because a busy design attracts more attention. Formal watches, on the other hand, are more simple, and they're meant to blend into your overall outfit. Who decides? Well, I decide. Obviously, this is my personal opinion. People are free to agree or disagree with it. I'm not trying to make a general statement on fashion trends because, frankly, I don't give a shit about that kind of thing. Does anyone wear any of their 'sports' watches whilst doing any sporting activities?! I wouldn't wear my PO swimming, it ain't that water proof and I'd not wear it rock climbing as it would get scratched to fuck! I once wore my PO while fucking. Is that a sporting activity? No. So you and your boyfriend can relax... So wrong; horizontal jogging is most definitely a sporting activity..... .....with girls or boys. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Kleen™ 45 Posted May 13, 2014 I think a serious misconception is that "expensive" watches are "formal" watches. But, this is not the case. A sub is a sports watch- appropriate with a polo shirt for example, doing outdoors sporty crap. Regardless of the fact that is cost you seven grand (or more?), it is not appropriate for wear with a jacket, and absolutely not appropriate with a jacket and tie. I think the worst idea ever conceived was when Rolex decided o make the sub in gold. I think that was the beginning of the end for the dresss/sport watch clear line of demarcation. The only expection to this would be if you were an endorcee of the watch brand, and "tied" to a particular model from them. In this case, when in public, you would be expected to be wearing a particular watch. If you must wear Rolex, an Air-King is far more appropriate than a sub, regardless of cost, in a more formal setting. If you have a leather band on your watch, I think it is in good taste to have the material match- shoes and belt should match anyway, (I hope you're not that guy with a red-brown belt and black shoes?) take it to the next level and have a matching watch strap. For all the mniscule details we all obsess over with reps, it is amazing that so little care goes into one's own appearance. If nothing else, it is an excuse to get yet another watch strap or complete watch! Metals should match. Silver/stainless/platinum/rhodium are all close enough to me to be interchangable. Non-plated white gold tends to look a bit warmer, so you might want a better match here. Yellow and rose gold should be worn together. Ring(s), cuff links etc. (allthough there should not be much in the way of "etc." in my opinion) should be the same metal. Someone else said: wedding ring and watch, much more is pushing it in the men's jewelry department... I wear a white gold band and my watches are all stainless. The ring is a bit warmer now that the rhodium is gone, but it works well enough. Tuxedo? Pocket watch. WAY classier, and a vintage piece really brings it home. I carried my Grandfather's Hamilton for my wedding... I never understood precious gems on a watch either. Thank you sir, put that in better words than I could hence why I was crucified for my OP. Glad to know someone has the same viewpoint. On the other hand, last time I make a thought provoking thread thats turns into pages of bickering. I guess I just stick to "hey which one of these should I buy" threads haha Hey Iceman, don't get disheartened! You've got people out there who think the same as you and care about this as much as you..... .....and others who don't. You've started a good thread here, but remember with polarizing topics like this they generally descend into bickering! Without bickering, I will say that I generally agree with Jim's point that Subs -- and other divers -- are not ideal as formal wear. Divers generally have busy designs, and that lends itself well to being a sport watch because a busy design attracts more attention. Formal watches, on the other hand, are more simple, and they're meant to blend into your overall outfit. Who decides? Well, I decide. Obviously, this is my personal opinion. People are free to agree or disagree with it. I'm not trying to make a general statement on fashion trends because, frankly, I don't give a shit about that kind of thing. Does anyone wear any of their 'sports' watches whilst doing any sporting activities?! I wouldn't wear my PO swimming, it ain't that water proof and I'd not wear it rock climbing as it would get scratched to fuck! I once wore my PO while fucking. Is that a sporting activity? No. So you and your boyfriend can relax... So wrong; horizontal jogging is most definitely a sporting activity..... .....with girls or boys. O'Reilley... I thought it was a social excercise in male bonding? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Beefalope 0 Posted May 13, 2014 I think a serious misconception is that "expensive" watches are "formal" watches. But, this is not the case. A sub is a sports watch- appropriate with a polo shirt for example, doing outdoors sporty crap. Regardless of the fact that is cost you seven grand (or more?), it is not appropriate for wear with a jacket, and absolutely not appropriate with a jacket and tie. I think the worst idea ever conceived was when Rolex decided o make the sub in gold. I think that was the beginning of the end for the dresss/sport watch clear line of demarcation. The only expection to this would be if you were an endorcee of the watch brand, and "tied" to a particular model from them. In this case, when in public, you would be expected to be wearing a particular watch. If you must wear Rolex, an Air-King is far more appropriate than a sub, regardless of cost, in a more formal setting. If you have a leather band on your watch, I think it is in good taste to have the material match- shoes and belt should match anyway, (I hope you're not that guy with a red-brown belt and black shoes?) take it to the next level and have a matching watch strap. For all the mniscule details we all obsess over with reps, it is amazing that so little care goes into one's own appearance. If nothing else, it is an excuse to get yet another watch strap or complete watch! Metals should match. Silver/stainless/platinum/rhodium are all close enough to me to be interchangable. Non-plated white gold tends to look a bit warmer, so you might want a better match here. Yellow and rose gold should be worn together. Ring(s), cuff links etc. (allthough there should not be much in the way of "etc." in my opinion) should be the same metal. Someone else said: wedding ring and watch, much more is pushing it in the men's jewelry department... I wear a white gold band and my watches are all stainless. The ring is a bit warmer now that the rhodium is gone, but it works well enough. Tuxedo? Pocket watch. WAY classier, and a vintage piece really brings it home. I carried my Grandfather's Hamilton for my wedding... I never understood precious gems on a watch either. Thank you sir, put that in better words than I could hence why I was crucified for my OP. Glad to know someone has the same viewpoint. On the other hand, last time I make a thought provoking thread thats turns into pages of bickering. I guess I just stick to "hey which one of these should I buy" threads haha Hey Iceman, don't get disheartened! You've got people out there who think the same as you and care about this as much as you..... .....and others who don't. You've started a good thread here, but remember with polarizing topics like this they generally descend into bickering! Without bickering, I will say that I generally agree with Jim's point that Subs -- and other divers -- are not ideal as formal wear. Divers generally have busy designs, and that lends itself well to being a sport watch because a busy design attracts more attention. Formal watches, on the other hand, are more simple, and they're meant to blend into your overall outfit. Who decides? Well, I decide. Obviously, this is my personal opinion. People are free to agree or disagree with it. I'm not trying to make a general statement on fashion trends because, frankly, I don't give a shit about that kind of thing. Does anyone wear any of their 'sports' watches whilst doing any sporting activities?! I wouldn't wear my PO swimming, it ain't that water proof and I'd not wear it rock climbing as it would get scratched to fuck! I once wore my PO while fucking. Is that a sporting activity? No. So you and your boyfriend can relax... If you say "no," then perhaps you're just not doing it right. My boyfriend and I can show you the proper way, sweetheart. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hornet 1 Posted May 13, 2014 I think a serious misconception is that "expensive" watches are "formal" watches. But, this is not the case. A sub is a sports watch- appropriate with a polo shirt for example, doing outdoors sporty crap. Regardless of the fact that is cost you seven grand (or more?), it is not appropriate for wear with a jacket, and absolutely not appropriate with a jacket and tie. I think the worst idea ever conceived was when Rolex decided o make the sub in gold. I think that was the beginning of the end for the dresss/sport watch clear line of demarcation. The only expection to this would be if you were an endorcee of the watch brand, and "tied" to a particular model from them. In this case, when in public, you would be expected to be wearing a particular watch. If you must wear Rolex, an Air-King is far more appropriate than a sub, regardless of cost, in a more formal setting. If you have a leather band on your watch, I think it is in good taste to have the material match- shoes and belt should match anyway, (I hope you're not that guy with a red-brown belt and black shoes?) take it to the next level and have a matching watch strap. For all the mniscule details we all obsess over with reps, it is amazing that so little care goes into one's own appearance. If nothing else, it is an excuse to get yet another watch strap or complete watch! Metals should match. Silver/stainless/platinum/rhodium are all close enough to me to be interchangable. Non-plated white gold tends to look a bit warmer, so you might want a better match here. Yellow and rose gold should be worn together. Ring(s), cuff links etc. (allthough there should not be much in the way of "etc." in my opinion) should be the same metal. Someone else said: wedding ring and watch, much more is pushing it in the men's jewelry department... I wear a white gold band and my watches are all stainless. The ring is a bit warmer now that the rhodium is gone, but it works well enough. Tuxedo? Pocket watch. WAY classier, and a vintage piece really brings it home. I carried my Grandfather's Hamilton for my wedding... I never understood precious gems on a watch either. Thank you sir, put that in better words than I could hence why I was crucified for my OP. Glad to know someone has the same viewpoint. On the other hand, last time I make a thought provoking thread thats turns into pages of bickering. I guess I just stick to "hey which one of these should I buy" threads haha Hey Iceman, don't get disheartened! You've got people out there who think the same as you and care about this as much as you..... .....and others who don't. You've started a good thread here, but remember with polarizing topics like this they generally descend into bickering! Without bickering, I will say that I generally agree with Jim's point that Subs -- and other divers -- are not ideal as formal wear. Divers generally have busy designs, and that lends itself well to being a sport watch because a busy design attracts more attention. Formal watches, on the other hand, are more simple, and they're meant to blend into your overall outfit. Who decides? Well, I decide. Obviously, this is my personal opinion. People are free to agree or disagree with it. I'm not trying to make a general statement on fashion trends because, frankly, I don't give a shit about that kind of thing. Does anyone wear any of their 'sports' watches whilst doing any sporting activities?! I wouldn't wear my PO swimming, it ain't that water proof and I'd not wear it rock climbing as it would get scratched to fuck! I once wore my PO while fucking. Is that a sporting activity? No. So you and your boyfriend can relax... So wrong; horizontal jogging is most definitely a sporting activity..... .....with girls or boys. O'Reilley... I thought it was a social excercise in male bonding? It's not male bonding when me and the missus indulge..... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hornet 1 Posted May 13, 2014 I think a serious misconception is that "expensive" watches are "formal" watches. But, this is not the case. A sub is a sports watch- appropriate with a polo shirt for example, doing outdoors sporty crap. Regardless of the fact that is cost you seven grand (or more?), it is not appropriate for wear with a jacket, and absolutely not appropriate with a jacket and tie. I think the worst idea ever conceived was when Rolex decided o make the sub in gold. I think that was the beginning of the end for the dresss/sport watch clear line of demarcation. The only expection to this would be if you were an endorcee of the watch brand, and "tied" to a particular model from them. In this case, when in public, you would be expected to be wearing a particular watch. If you must wear Rolex, an Air-King is far more appropriate than a sub, regardless of cost, in a more formal setting. If you have a leather band on your watch, I think it is in good taste to have the material match- shoes and belt should match anyway, (I hope you're not that guy with a red-brown belt and black shoes?) take it to the next level and have a matching watch strap. For all the mniscule details we all obsess over with reps, it is amazing that so little care goes into one's own appearance. If nothing else, it is an excuse to get yet another watch strap or complete watch! Metals should match. Silver/stainless/platinum/rhodium are all close enough to me to be interchangable. Non-plated white gold tends to look a bit warmer, so you might want a better match here. Yellow and rose gold should be worn together. Ring(s), cuff links etc. (allthough there should not be much in the way of "etc." in my opinion) should be the same metal. Someone else said: wedding ring and watch, much more is pushing it in the men's jewelry department... I wear a white gold band and my watches are all stainless. The ring is a bit warmer now that the rhodium is gone, but it works well enough. Tuxedo? Pocket watch. WAY classier, and a vintage piece really brings it home. I carried my Grandfather's Hamilton for my wedding... I never understood precious gems on a watch either. Thank you sir, put that in better words than I could hence why I was crucified for my OP. Glad to know someone has the same viewpoint. On the other hand, last time I make a thought provoking thread thats turns into pages of bickering. I guess I just stick to "hey which one of these should I buy" threads haha Hey Iceman, don't get disheartened! You've got people out there who think the same as you and care about this as much as you..... .....and others who don't. You've started a good thread here, but remember with polarizing topics like this they generally descend into bickering! Without bickering, I will say that I generally agree with Jim's point that Subs -- and other divers -- are not ideal as formal wear. Divers generally have busy designs, and that lends itself well to being a sport watch because a busy design attracts more attention. Formal watches, on the other hand, are more simple, and they're meant to blend into your overall outfit. Who decides? Well, I decide. Obviously, this is my personal opinion. People are free to agree or disagree with it. I'm not trying to make a general statement on fashion trends because, frankly, I don't give a shit about that kind of thing. Does anyone wear any of their 'sports' watches whilst doing any sporting activities?! I wouldn't wear my PO swimming, it ain't that water proof and I'd not wear it rock climbing as it would get scratched to fuck! I once wore my PO while fucking. Is that a sporting activity? No. So you and your boyfriend can relax... If you say "no," then perhaps you're just not doing it right. My boyfriend and I can show you the proper way, sweetheart. An offer of a threesome, with an educational slant, fantastic! This thread is just getting better.... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Realism 72 Posted May 13, 2014 beefalope is a she-male Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Kleen™ 45 Posted May 13, 2014 I think a serious misconception is that "expensive" watches are "formal" watches. But, this is not the case. A sub is a sports watch- appropriate with a polo shirt for example, doing outdoors sporty crap. Regardless of the fact that is cost you seven grand (or more?), it is not appropriate for wear with a jacket, and absolutely not appropriate with a jacket and tie. I think the worst idea ever conceived was when Rolex decided o make the sub in gold. I think that was the beginning of the end for the dresss/sport watch clear line of demarcation. The only expection to this would be if you were an endorcee of the watch brand, and "tied" to a particular model from them. In this case, when in public, you would be expected to be wearing a particular watch. If you must wear Rolex, an Air-King is far more appropriate than a sub, regardless of cost, in a more formal setting. If you have a leather band on your watch, I think it is in good taste to have the material match- shoes and belt should match anyway, (I hope you're not that guy with a red-brown belt and black shoes?) take it to the next level and have a matching watch strap. For all the mniscule details we all obsess over with reps, it is amazing that so little care goes into one's own appearance. If nothing else, it is an excuse to get yet another watch strap or complete watch! Metals should match. Silver/stainless/platinum/rhodium are all close enough to me to be interchangable. Non-plated white gold tends to look a bit warmer, so you might want a better match here. Yellow and rose gold should be worn together. Ring(s), cuff links etc. (allthough there should not be much in the way of "etc." in my opinion) should be the same metal. Someone else said: wedding ring and watch, much more is pushing it in the men's jewelry department... I wear a white gold band and my watches are all stainless. The ring is a bit warmer now that the rhodium is gone, but it works well enough. Tuxedo? Pocket watch. WAY classier, and a vintage piece really brings it home. I carried my Grandfather's Hamilton for my wedding... I never understood precious gems on a watch either. Thank you sir, put that in better words than I could hence why I was crucified for my OP. Glad to know someone has the same viewpoint. On the other hand, last time I make a thought provoking thread thats turns into pages of bickering. I guess I just stick to "hey which one of these should I buy" threads haha Hey Iceman, don't get disheartened! You've got people out there who think the same as you and care about this as much as you..... .....and others who don't. You've started a good thread here, but remember with polarizing topics like this they generally descend into bickering! Without bickering, I will say that I generally agree with Jim's point that Subs -- and other divers -- are not ideal as formal wear. Divers generally have busy designs, and that lends itself well to being a sport watch because a busy design attracts more attention. Formal watches, on the other hand, are more simple, and they're meant to blend into your overall outfit. Who decides? Well, I decide. Obviously, this is my personal opinion. People are free to agree or disagree with it. I'm not trying to make a general statement on fashion trends because, frankly, I don't give a shit about that kind of thing. Does anyone wear any of their 'sports' watches whilst doing any sporting activities?! I wouldn't wear my PO swimming, it ain't that water proof and I'd not wear it rock climbing as it would get scratched to fuck! I once wore my PO while fucking. Is that a sporting activity? No. So you and your boyfriend can relax... If you say "no," then perhaps you're just not doing it right. My boyfriend and I can show you the proper way, sweetheart. I'm sure you can...:-) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mystery Shopper 5,887 Posted May 13, 2014 Fashion changes over time. Gold watches will make a comeback soon. Some people never gave up on gold. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
