richiero 0 Posted September 8, 2010 is that a good ar to have on a rep??? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
AllergyDoc 40 Posted September 8, 2010 It is if the gen has double AR. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
richiero 0 Posted September 8, 2010 It is if the gen has double AR. i see thanks for the reply Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Member X 91 Posted September 8, 2010 Double Anti-Reflective coating nearly always looks good! It's a coating on the cystal that's on both sides - inside the watch and on the surface you can touch. It's quite delicate in some cases and you have to be careful not to scratch it, but it makes a big difference. Look at the pictures of the blue and black Breitling SuperOcean Heritage reps (shortened to SOH) to see good double AR! A lot of gens have it, with the notable exceptions of Rolex and Panerai that have either no AR or only have AR under the date cyclops (rolex). Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
AustinTech 0 Posted September 8, 2010 The AR on reps is usually pretty crappy. Usually it is just a blue film and doesn't resemble the gen AR at all. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
gB. 0 Posted September 8, 2010 The AR on reps is usually pretty crappy. Usually it is just a blue film and doesn't resemble the gen AR at all. +1 normally, although the recent UPO versions look nice Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
madcatlancelot 1 Posted September 8, 2010 Some rep double AR coating are OK, I have a skyland avenger and a chronomat evo with rep double AR and it's ok. The double AR coating from modders (such as takashi), however, are a class above the rest. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
AllergyDoc 40 Posted September 8, 2010 The new Super Avengers have AR as good as the gen, some say. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
