LightGeek 25 Posted June 23, 2014 This is definitely a keeper. 37mm I believe with manual ST movement. That crystal is delicious and the size is perfect for my diminutive wrists. Someone chime in with the model number? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Conex 0 Posted June 23, 2014 Would love it if you could post some pics in my VinRoPorn thread mate. This will be right at home. http://www.rwg.bz/board/index.php?showtopic=80014 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Conex 0 Posted June 23, 2014 Its a stainless steel bezel 6263 by the way, as far as I know, although someone will probably pipe in and correct me. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Robin195959 2 Posted June 23, 2014 Sorry Conex. 6265. 6263 is black bezel. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
LightGeek 25 Posted June 23, 2014 Only immediate inaccuracy seems to be the bezel font. What else? Oh that and I got $35000 off MSRP Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Proctor 5 Posted June 23, 2014 +1 on the 6265. Your dial configuration was produced for a limited time and the black dials are a lot more rare than the white and also more expensive. One went for a million plus at auction a year or so ago. Gen 6265: She's a beaut. Wear in good health sir. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Del Boy 0 Posted June 23, 2014 Love it and want one... 37mm is not too small for a watch as beautiful as this. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
LightGeek 25 Posted June 23, 2014 @proctor, thanks for that, now I know what the immediate inaccuracies are. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Proctor 5 Posted June 23, 2014 Meh inaccuracies, no one will notice or care unless you walk in to an AD. :P I think it looks stunning the way it is. Honestly I haven't seen many 6265 dials better than yours out there. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
PrDubis 0 Posted June 23, 2014 (edited) @proctor, thanks for that, now I know what the immediate inaccuracies are. Wrong bezel fonts, wrong dial fonts, case is tto thick because the watch is fitted with an A7750, pushers are wrong, crown is too big, subdials are not the same size as gen, crystal is wrong... Edited June 23, 2014 by PrDubis Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
houndoggie 58 Posted June 24, 2014 @proctor, thanks for that, now I know what the immediate inaccuracies are. Wrong bezel fonts, wrong dial fonts, case is tto thick because the watch is fitted with an A7750, pushers are wrong, crown is too big, subdials are not the same size as gen, crystal is wrong... movement is ST-19 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cynikal.Mindset 1 Posted June 24, 2014 I miss my 6263 even though it was small Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ishmael 92 Posted June 24, 2014 Yep 6265 - I think that watch used to be mine! You got it from houndoggie right? Oh I do miss her... she funded the gold 6263s I have now, but she sure is shiny in your pics... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
LightGeek 25 Posted June 24, 2014 Meh inaccuracies, no one will notice or care unless you walk in to an AD. :P I think it looks stunning the way it is. Honestly I haven't seen many 6265 dials better than yours out there. I think it's fine too. The gen dial printing looks too small and unbalanced -- dwarfed by the sub dials. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
LightGeek 25 Posted June 24, 2014 @proctor, thanks for that, now I know what the immediate inaccuracies are. Wrong bezel fonts, wrong dial fonts, case is tto thick because the watch is fitted with an A7750, pushers are wrong, crown is too big, subdials are not the same size as gen, crystal is wrong... Thanks, your list appears to be generic rep Tona inaccuracies that don't all pertain here but I appreciate it! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ishmael 92 Posted June 24, 2014 The only major inaccuracy that bothered me when I had it was the oversized dial font - waaaaaay too big. That and the dial spacing were really the only things that bothered me somewhat, but other than that, it's pretty good. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
LightGeek 25 Posted June 24, 2014 The only major inaccuracy that bothered me when I had it was the oversized dial font - waaaaaay too big. That and the dial spacing were really the only things that bothered me somewhat, but other than that, it's pretty good. That's good because you sold it and I like the size of the dial font (vs too small vintage) hahaha Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ishmael 92 Posted June 24, 2014 The only major inaccuracy that bothered me when I had it was the oversized dial font - waaaaaay too big. That and the dial spacing were really the only things that bothered me somewhat, but other than that, it's pretty good. That's good because you sold it and I like the size of the dial font (vs too small vintage) hahaha That's great actually - I might buy the same thing again, only a 6263 (black acrylic bezel), so I might have to learn to live with it anyway! It really is a fabulous watch and I'd probably still have it if I hadn't lost my fucking mind when the gold 6263/5's came out. Glad you ended up with it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Proctor 5 Posted June 24, 2014 @proctor, thanks for that, now I know what the immediate inaccuracies are. Wrong bezel fonts, wrong dial fonts, case is tto thick because the watch is fitted with an A7750, pushers are wrong, crown is too big, subdials are not the same size as gen, crystal is wrong... Thanks, your list appears to be generic rep Tona inaccuracies that don't all pertain here but I appreciate it! :troll: Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
LightGeek 25 Posted June 24, 2014 Oh no! An imperfection near the 10 marker on subdial. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ishmael 92 Posted June 24, 2014 Oh no! An imperfection near the 10 marker on subdial. Oh that's not my watch then... Cool close-ups by the way! What are you using? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
LightGeek 25 Posted June 24, 2014 Oh no! A speck of dust in the hole of the crown. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
LightGeek 25 Posted June 24, 2014 Using an iPhone. I have a thread about macro somewhere. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
LightGeek 25 Posted June 24, 2014 My God how did it leave QC with that terrible 180 and scratch on the plexi near 170? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
