Jump to content
sherbert79

What is a “Hack” movement?

Recommended Posts

sherbert79

Hi All

I’m desperate to get a Daytona but have always been worried about the seconds @ 6 issue with the A7750, been doing a lot of research and some posts mention to go with a 21j on this watch but I’ve came across this watch and I’ve noticed it has a hacked movement of an A7750, does this mean the seconds at 6 issue doesn’t happen??

 

http://trustytime.store/index.php?main_page=product_info&cPath=1_6&products_id=16480

 

Thanks

 

Scott

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Nikosaldente

Hack Movement is the movement that when you pull the crown to time setting position, the seconds hand stops moving!

:beer2:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Tits McGee

Seconds at 6 are known to be "timebombs". Nobody I'm aware of makes a reliable movement.

I'd avoid them at all costs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
sherbert79
25 minutes ago, Tits McGee said:

Seconds at 6 are known to be "timebombs". Nobody I'm aware of makes a reliable movement.

I'd avoid them at all costs.

Well for the money I would be paying I might just forget the Daytona, unless a 21j is more reliable?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
GenTLe
2 hours ago, Tits McGee said:

Seconds at 6 are known to be "timebombs". Nobody I'm aware of makes a reliable movement.

I'd avoid them at all costs.

The movement used in new slim IWC portuguese and also in the ARF daytona (those with non functioning register at 3 and 9) are absolutely fine. The problem of the old ones was the not jeweled transfer gears. There's nothing like that anymore on these ones.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Tits McGee
1 hour ago, GenTLe said:

The movement used in new slim IWC portuguese and also in the ARF daytona (those with non functioning register at 3 and 9) are absolutely fine. The problem of the old ones was the not jeweled transfer gears. There's nothing like that anymore on these ones.

No more problems with seconds at 6? This is the first I'm hearing about it.

I'd be happy to be wrong but isn't it more or less a cardinal rule to avoid these? 

I don't even buy straight 7750's anymore. I'd rather gamble $380.00 at a casino. I'm just sayin'

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
NFleischer

The new ARF Daytona does not use a 7750 movement. That's why it's closer to gen in terms of thickness.

Faux chronos are the downside.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Rx4Time
18 minutes ago, NFleischer said:

The new ARF Daytona does not use a 7750 movement. That's why it's closer to gen in terms of thickness.

Faux chronos are the downside.

The ARF uses a 7750 with a transfer module to move the rumning seconds to the 6 o'clock position.  The only chronograph hand which is functioning.   There is a decorative plate to give the appearance of a 4130.  If they had eliminated this it could have been the same thickness as gen.  It's a fairly reliable setup, best overall so far for a Daytona. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
trailboss99

AFIK all 7750 hack anyway.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10:10 Watch Repair
15 minutes ago, trailboss99 said:

AFIK all 7750 hack anyway.

 

Shall we assume he means "hacked together?"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
trailboss99

Yeah that was kinda my thought as well, sounds like a bit of a hack job. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
GenTLe
6 hours ago, NFleischer said:
The new ARF Daytona does not use a 7750 movement. That's why it's closer to gen in terms of thickness.
Faux chronos are the downside.

Not true: it is basically a 7750, but they don't have the upper transfer gears like in the old thick ones taking the motion from sec at 9: instead they copied from the IWC gen movement and had a pinion taking the sec motion straight from the main gear train to a couple of well jeweled small gears. On RWI there was a disassembly thread showing this, months ago :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
trailboss99
5 minutes ago, GenTLe said:

Not true: it is basically a 7750, but they don't have the upper transfer gears like in the old thick ones taking the motion from sec at 9: instead they copied from the IWC gen movement and had a pinion moving the sec motion straight from the main gear train to a couple of well jeweled small gears. On RWI there was a disassembly thread showing this, months ago :)

Yeah, in the same way as companies such as Breitling do you could call it a new calibre but the base MVT is still a 7750.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
NFleischer

Hmm; so the chronos are functional?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
GenTLe
1 hour ago, NFleischer said:

Hmm; so the chronos are functional?

On the ARF one? Partially: as I wrote is the same movement used here:

Portuguese IW3714 Diamond ZF V2 1:1 Best Edition Black Dial on Black Leather Strap A79350 (Slim Movement)

 

So the small seconds at 6 will work, the central big chrono second hand will work, but the subdials at 3 and 9 in the Daytona will be not functional because they simply don't exist in this movement.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Tits McGee
19 hours ago, sherbert79 said:

Hi All

I’m desperate to get a Daytona but have always been worried about the seconds @ 6 issue with the A7750, been doing a lot of research and some posts mention to go with a 21j on this watch but I’ve came across this watch and I’ve noticed it has a hacked movement of an A7750, does this mean the seconds at 6 issue doesn’t happen??

 

http://trustytime.store/index.php?main_page=product_info&cPath=1_6&products_id=16480

 

Thanks

 

Scott

If I was desperate for a Daytona I'd bypass the reps and go for an Alpha with a Seagull movement. I believe you can find them under $200 new. Just my .02.

DhyxjMm.jpgWpY3pQI.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
sherbert79

So from what I take from this......if I want a Daytona thats not going to die then I would need to get the seconds at 6 sub dial frozen? Is this an easy job for a watch smith to do? It is strange why such a decent looking watch comes with these issues 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ssouthall6
So from what I take from this......if I want a Daytona thats not going to die then I would need to get the seconds at 6 sub dial frozen? Is this an easy job for a watch smith to do? It is strange why such a decent looking watch comes with these issues 


No, the seconds at 6 ARF daytona is reliable now as stated above. The old ones were ticking time bombs.

The best daytona out there is the ARF by a long way right now.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
sherbert79
47 minutes ago, ssouthall6 said:

 


No, the seconds at 6 ARF daytona is reliable now as stated above. The old ones were ticking time bombs.

The best daytona out there is the ARF by a long way right now.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

Thanks for the info, what TD stocks the ARF version?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ssouthall6
Thanks for the info, what TD stocks the ARF version?


TD's don't keep stock of watches generally. Any TD can get hold of ARF watches, just send them a mail telling them what you want.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ssouthall6
Thanks for the info, what TD stocks the ARF version?


TD's don't keep stock of watches generally. Any TD can get hold of ARF watches, just send them a mail telling them what you want.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
sherbert79

Thanks guys I will have a look for the ARF version and find out what TD can get them, are they much more expensive than a normal movement?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Robse1

is it true that there will be a full functional chrono movement this year? heard this.... and a ice blue dial ARF would be nice :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×