AlphaLima 17 Posted July 6, 2011 (edited) Is it just me, or does anyone else find these kinds of watches a little garish? I'd rather have a £10,000 PAM than pay £1m for this. Edited July 6, 2011 by AlphaLima Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SeanusMaximus 0 Posted July 6, 2011 Just stupid money - would rather spend £35,000 (if i had it) on this TAG Heuer Mikrograph, only chrono that times 1/100th of a second!! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
AlphaLima 17 Posted July 6, 2011 (edited) Wow.....i Tag that i like! it's taken long enough, but there it is. Is there a rep of that? Also, i understand and appreciate the craftsmanship that goes into a HW watch, it just looks a tad vulgar to me. EDIT: Ah, it's a Heuer, not really a TAG. That's probably why i like it. Edited July 6, 2011 by AlphaLima Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SeanusMaximus 0 Posted July 6, 2011 Wow.....i Tag that i like! it's taken long enough, but there it is. Is there a rep of that? Also, i understand and appreciate the craftsmanship that goes into a HW watch, it just looks a tad vulgar to me. Theres a standard seconds quartz rep on Timeshop (that TBH looks nothing like the gen ) but I doubt there will ever be a properrep - check the movement: Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RS9 1 Posted July 6, 2011 Believe it or not, that's one of Harry Winston's more wearable watches. The ridiculous things some of the "boutique" manufacturers produce are simply part of an ongoing horological pissing contest. I believe watches are made to wear so make them as such..... kthnxbye. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
AGL 0 Posted July 6, 2011 I like it & would wear it. (both of those above.) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ska 11 Posted July 6, 2011 If the Harry Winston and a pam were the only watches left on earth, the Pam was free and the HW was full price. I'd save up. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
