Comex 0 Posted August 27, 2011 (edited) Fuzzy pic. Fake Edited August 27, 2011 by Comex Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mspangl 0 Posted August 27, 2011 REP Look at the crownguards.. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Miracle 13 Posted August 27, 2011 It's a mates he's going to buy it from he's mate and is told it's a gen I'm Not sure I had a look and it looks good to me. Got the numbers on the breclet and crown is facing the right way up Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Comex 0 Posted August 27, 2011 Up more pics if possible. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
WebWind 1 Posted August 27, 2011 On my Milgauss is crown facing the right way up, too. If it is gen, he must have some papers, box .... if not and he still insist that is a gen, suggest inspection by AD Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
chum_2000_uk 0 Posted August 27, 2011 I reckon it's a rep... open it up and find out! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
d1isthe1 0 Posted August 27, 2011 Rep.. plz post more pics if possible Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
LHOOQ 0 Posted August 27, 2011 At the risk of embarrassing myself on a watch I'm not that familiar with... I'm going to say that's a gen. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
solkryssare 109 Posted August 27, 2011 I agree. Looks gen Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
torobravo 9 Posted August 27, 2011 In polish it´s called repsky Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Akira 0 Posted August 27, 2011 Shouldn't there be better AR on the cyclops? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
LHOOQ 0 Posted August 27, 2011 I agree. Looks gen Thanks, buddy! If I'm going down, at least it's with a guy with a submarine! Granted, the CHS Noobfactory GMT II was one of the best Rolex reps in recent years, but I remember a few tells from By-Tor's old review: Weak date mag and a slightly narrow bezel. (I also seem to remember the insert sitting a bit differently on the rep bezel, but I could be wrong.) You can only see those tells on a straight-on shot, so... score! Of course, your mate ought to just open it up and see. Much easier. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
torobravo 9 Posted August 27, 2011 More pics are needed. That crown looks too small to me. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
solkryssare 109 Posted August 27, 2011 I agree. Looks gen Thanks, buddy! If I'm going down, at least it's with a guy with a submarine! Granted, the CHS Noobfactory GMT II was one of the best Rolex reps in recent years, but I remember a few tells from By-Tor's old review: Weak date mag and a slightly narrow bezel. (I also seem to remember the insert sitting a bit differently on the rep bezel, but I could be wrong.) You can only see those tells on a straight-on shot, so... score! Of course, your mate ought to just open it up and see. Much easier. LOL. I'll make sure to give you a heads up before we dive. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Dendo 93 Posted August 27, 2011 Yeah more pics and better ones needed. And open it up mate - simple and pretty diagnostic. On a different note - just shows us how good Rolex reps are nowadays, that we are having this discussion among this forum's experts! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Miracle 13 Posted August 27, 2011 I took that pic this morning can't get anymore as I'm not with my mate now out shopping b4 holiday Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Miracle 13 Posted August 27, 2011 If it's GEN what should he PAY for it no box or papers Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Dendo 93 Posted August 27, 2011 Check this - pre-owned for about $4k Crucial thing is to check authenticity - both for selling and/or keeping. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
LHOOQ 0 Posted August 27, 2011 Without box/papers? I wouldn't pay much over USD 4000. In London, I guess that works out to about 2500-2600 guineas, and two groats. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
pollux1 3 Posted August 27, 2011 Insist it's taken to an AD, have the caseback popped and check the movement and inspect the dial/bracelet/case etc, it's the safest way. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Charleston 0 Posted August 27, 2011 Im going to go with REP... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
sconehead 5 Posted August 27, 2011 ...from what I can make out from the pic provided, the handstack seems correct, be aware there are unreliable CHS rep movements out there, but along with this and the tightness of those end links it may be gen...need better, clearer pics to be sure though... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Miracle 13 Posted August 28, 2011 100% gen he just got back from AD Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
