solkryssare 109 Posted September 6, 2011 I've been lusting for a GMT for a long time now. And the ref 16760 has always captured my interest. I knew it was thicker than the 1675, 16750 and the 16700 but I didn't know it was thicker than the more modern 16710. Well it is! I love the thickness of my SD and a thin case GMT just wouldn't feel as substantial. Now I've learnt that its just as thick as a Sea Dweller but still holds the beauty of a true GMT. This is no on top of my list What do you guys think? Should a GMT be thin or do you like me, love the fat lady? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
KinCaidk 0 Posted September 6, 2011 I don't like fat chicks. Why do you always have to be so different? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
greg_r 83 Posted September 6, 2011 Depends on how well she sings.... Seriously, though, I suspect I'd prefer the thicker case on the wrist... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
solkryssare 109 Posted September 6, 2011 Just look at the pictures. She can definitely hold a tune Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mazz 62 Posted September 6, 2011 I don't like fat chicks. Why do you always have to be so different? Fat chicks are like small motorcycles they are fun to ride you just don't want your friends catching you. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
solkryssare 109 Posted September 6, 2011 So, any serious thoughts on this? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
KinCaidk 0 Posted September 6, 2011 So, any serious thoughts on this? No Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
KeNnY 29 Posted September 6, 2011 It needs high plexi to be super fat Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Silverspeed 10 Posted September 6, 2011 Not a huge difference but I'd prefer the thicker one......watch that is Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
robznet 0 Posted September 6, 2011 I don't like fat chicks. Why do you always have to be so different? Fat chicks are like small motorcycles they are fun to ride you just don't want your friends catching you. :hehehe: Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Akira 0 Posted September 6, 2011 Thin case all the way for a GMT! Reason? It's not a diver! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
solkryssare 109 Posted September 6, 2011 Thin case all the way for a GMT!Reason? It's not a diver! What has that got to do with it? A thick watch doesn't necessarily equal it being a dive watch. Just look at the Fortis pilot watches. Thye are all thick as hell. And lovely might I add Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
KinCaidk 0 Posted September 6, 2011 Slim case for me too.. I actually think that's what I like about my 1675. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Akira 0 Posted September 6, 2011 Thicker case Rolex always looks like a divers watch to me....The GMT just doesn't, mainly because of the thinner case. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
solkryssare 109 Posted September 6, 2011 You guys are entitled to your own opinion, but you are wrong! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
KeNnY 29 Posted September 6, 2011 YAY for thick , robust, big, huge, heavy and nice watches ! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
solkryssare 109 Posted September 6, 2011 YAY for thick , robust, big, huge, heavy and nice watches ! I knew you'd understand kenny Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Inushuk 0 Posted September 6, 2011 Fat lady is more sexy ... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
pamelo 0 Posted September 6, 2011 I have reps of the GMT and the Sub. The overall thickness of the Sub is greater because the back cover has more bow to it. The case itself less the back cover is slightly thicker with the GMT. I don't know about the gens. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
LHOOQ 0 Posted September 6, 2011 Well... If you're going to be going through multiple timezones, you'll need a fat-bottomed girl to make this rockin' world go round! RIP Freddy! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Dendo 93 Posted September 6, 2011 Thin for a dress watch, fat for a sporty watch. So back to you - do you see the GMT as a sporty or dress style? I personally prefer thick watches but I see the GMT as more dressy and thus I would prefer it thinner. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
solkryssare 109 Posted September 6, 2011 Thin for a dress watch, fat for a sporty watch. So back to you - do you see the GMT as a sporty or dress style? I personally prefer thick watches but I see the GMT as more dressy and thus I would prefer it thinner. I definitely see it as a sports watch. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SeanusMaximus 0 Posted September 6, 2011 Thin for a dress watch, fat for a sporty watch. So back to you - do you see the GMT as a sporty or dress style? I personally prefer thick watches but I see the GMT as more dressy and thus I would prefer it thinner. I definitely see it as a sports watch. Sports - thick case - go! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
