AllergyDoc 40 Posted January 1, 2009 (edited) Imagecave image: Flickr photo: I guess I'm switching to Flickr Edited January 2, 2009 by AllergyDoc Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
greg_r 81 Posted January 1, 2009 I put the pics in again and they still don't show. The links work on RG and RWI. RG and RWI use different board software. Unfortunately, iPB doesn't like URLs with lots of "%20" (faux spaces) in them. It does depend on the configuration of the server hosting the remote image, however. Sorry - not much I can do about that one - the only fix is to remove the spaces from the file name (as a general rule correct syntax is to use underline chars instead of spaces in URLs) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
AllergyDoc 40 Posted January 2, 2009 The pictures at the beginning of the thread come from the same host, Imagecave. Why do they show? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
KBH 7 Posted January 2, 2009 Here you go Doc. I stole your image: Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
tenacious_b 0 Posted January 2, 2009 not to steal the thread or anything, but Doc (and everyone else) what's the consensus on these asian eta clones? I have been waiting for my dealer to get us stocks of the swiss version, but my need for this watch is wearing down my patience. I might just opt for the clone, but want to know more. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
oscarmadfish 0 Posted January 2, 2009 lovely pic of 2 lovely watches asian DSD is going very well never stopped yet but i use a winder and keeps very good time Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
greg_r 81 Posted January 2, 2009 The pictures at the beginning of the thread come from the same host, Imagecave. Why do they show? Beats the hell outta me. Links in both posts were posted correctly, but both have spaces in the file names. Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't - which is why I always use underlines rather than spaces. Like I said - for some reason, iPB sometimes has problems with multiple %20 faux spaces in URLs... Sorry - not much I can do about it, I'm afraid. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
KBH 7 Posted January 2, 2009 not to steal the thread or anything, but Doc (and everyone else) what's the consensus on these asian eta clones? I have been waiting for my dealer to get us stocks of the swiss version, but my need for this watch is wearing down my patience. I might just opt for the clone, but want to know more. I've come to the conclusion that I'd rather have a new clone movement than an old, surplus, or possibly used ETA movement that seem to end up in our replicas. I have what I thought was a new ETA movement being serviced and Rex says it was old and gummed up. Also hearing rumors about how the lower quality ETA movements that don't pass QC get dumped in the GZ rep market. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
AllergyDoc 40 Posted January 2, 2009 The pictures at the beginning of the thread come from the same host, Imagecave. Why do they show? Beats the hell outta me. Links in both posts were posted correctly, but both have spaces in the file names. Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't - which is why I always use underlines rather than spaces. Like I said - for some reason, iPB sometimes has problems with multiple %20 faux spaces in URLs... Sorry - not much I can do about it, I'm afraid. Well, I'm taking Swissaddict's advice and am moving my photos to Flickr. It's not as handy as Imagecave, but the image quality is better, it's cheaper, and there are no limits to anything. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
AllergyDoc 40 Posted January 2, 2009 not to steal the thread or anything, but Doc (and everyone else) what's the consensus on these asian eta clones? I have been waiting for my dealer to get us stocks of the swiss version, but my need for this watch is wearing down my patience. I might just opt for the clone, but want to know more. I've come to the conclusion that I'd rather have a new clone movement than an old, surplus, or possibly used ETA movement that seem to end up in our replicas. I have what I thought was a new ETA movement being serviced and Rex says it was old and gummed up. Also hearing rumors about how the lower quality ETA movements that don't pass QC get dumped in the GZ rep market. I'm hearing this so much now that I'm being persuaded. I haven't cracked this watch open yet, but I will as it runs about 15 seconds fast. I'll take some pics. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
greg_r 81 Posted January 2, 2009 I'm hearing this so much now that I'm being persuaded. I haven't cracked this watch open yet, but I will as it runs about 15 seconds fast. I'll take some pics. Yup - leaning that way myself... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
greg_r 81 Posted January 2, 2009 Well, I'm taking Swissaddict's advice and am moving my photos to Flickr. It's not as handy as Imagecave, but the image quality is better, it's cheaper, and there are no limits to anything. Sounds good to me Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Luthier 1 Posted January 7, 2009 Why not Photobucket? Never had any problems with it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
alphakazi 0 Posted January 7, 2009 been using http://www.imageshack.us/ for the past 5-6 years Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
greg_r 81 Posted January 7, 2009 I've been hosting 'em myself for years.... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
onzenuub 308 Posted January 7, 2009 I've been hosting 'em myself for years.... You're hosting yourself for years???? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
greg_r 81 Posted January 7, 2009 Every chance I get. I was talking about photos, however. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
onzenuub 308 Posted January 7, 2009 Every chance I get. I was talking about photos, however. About yourself, jeeeeeeeeeeeeez Greg, didn't expect that from you. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
alphakazi 0 Posted January 7, 2009 I've been hosting 'em myself for years.... to lazy to fire up the ftp client - takes about 30 seconds with imageshack but I suppose I should use my wasted bandwidth for something Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Massimo 53 Posted January 7, 2009 I was away at New Year and managed to miss this post the first time around so, at the risk of hijacking the thread back on topic, I have to say that is one fine looking watch. I was horrified when I first saw the Deep Sea but it's growing on me. Width-wise it isn't as big as I thought, but it looks very chunky. Is it comfortable to wear? Congratulations on a good buy, Doc. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
alphakazi 0 Posted January 7, 2009 it'd be nice to have a fantasy deep sea with the damn words removed "ORIGINAL ESCAPE VALVE" it's like writing 32value 8 cylinder dual overhead cam on the side of your car with 12" lettering Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
AllergyDoc 40 Posted January 7, 2009 I was away at New Year and managed to miss this post the first time around so, at the risk of hijacking the thread back on topic, I have to say that is one fine looking watch. I was horrified when I first saw the Deep Sea but it's growing on me. Width-wise it isn't as big as I thought, but it looks very chunky. Is it comfortable to wear? Congratulations on a good buy, Doc. Everyone panned it when it was first announced. "It's ugly!" "I can't believe Rolex could be so stupid!" "Who would buy that?" Now they sell like hotcakes. But that was my reaction to the Graham. Now I love it. (If I ever get it back from Sead. It seems to have gotten lost in the mail.) It's more comfy than the Skyland and Super Avenger reps because the bracelet is better, IMO. With the micro adjustment of the divers' extension, the bracelet can be worn at precise sizes to please everyone. I haven't worn it to the office yet because I like the smaller watches that fit more comfortably under the shirt sleeve. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Massimo 53 Posted January 7, 2009 Everyone panned it when it was first announced. "It's ugly!" "I can't believe Rolex could be so stupid!" "Who would buy that?" Now they sell like hotcakes. Yep, Rolex have made a smart move in the end, accommodating the trend for larger watches. +1 for the fantasy rep with the words removed though! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
greg_r 81 Posted January 7, 2009 I've been hosting 'em myself for years.... to lazy to fire up the ftp client - takes about 30 seconds with imageshack but I suppose I should use my wasted bandwidth for something Takes about 30 secs with FTP too the way I have it set up Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
greg_r 81 Posted January 7, 2009 Everyone panned it when it was first announced. "It's ugly!" "I can't believe Rolex could be so stupid!" "Who would buy that?" Now they sell like hotcakes. But that was my reaction to the Graham. Now I love it. (If I ever get it back from Sead. It seems to have gotten lost in the mail.) Hmm - I love the DS, but that's still my reaction to the Graham - ugliest watch I've ever seen imho (but then I like the BR01 and you think that's ugly... interesting, no?) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
