Another moonwatch

[Rolls-Man 0]

Grey side of the moon. Looks nice with the moondust dial.

 

 

Rep anyone

Edited February 11, 2015 by Rolls-Man

[Martijn0007 3]

I think 'late to the party' wouldn't fully cover this one...

 

http://www.rwg.bz/board/index.php?showtopic=87483

[black263 228]

Grey side of the moon. Looks nice with the moondust dial.

 

 

Rep anyone

Search button anyone? :suck: 33 previous threads.

[GoW13 19]

I´m in! But only if the hours are @6 ^^

 

If they rep it, i hope they´ll lume the bezel and the crown

[black263 228]

I´m in! But only if the hours are @6 ^^

 

If they rep it, i hope they´ll lume the bezel and the crown

That would keep Kenny off the streets for a while.

[dfq23 131]

Grey side of the moon. Looks nice with the moondust dial.

 

 

Rep anyone

[Rolls-Man 0]

At the bottom of my post, I asked if there was a rep. The link that was given didn't mention one.

 

So yes I saw the thread that was last year. Any more smartass comments?

[dfq23 131]

http://www.pf-818.com/0omsp00182-speedmaster-dark-side-moon-tgle-os20-quartz-p-16425.html

 

At the bottom of my post, I asked if there was a rep. The link that was given didn't mention one.

 

So yes I saw the thread that was last year. Any more smartass comments?

 

Probably

[steve123 0]

Gorgeous watch.. would love to see a lumed bezel as well.. curious Rolly.. did you search if there was a rep, did one come up in your search? That'd be something i'd grab.

[BadPickle 2,747]

At the bottom of my post, I asked if there was a rep. The link that was given didn't mention one.

 

So yes I saw the thread that was last year. Any more smartass comments?

 

What did you expect?

 

This must be the sixtysquillionth thread you've started asking if there's a good rep of this/that/other.

 

Tedious at best.

[dsg2013 17]

At the bottom of my post, I asked if there was a rep. The link that was given didn't mention one.

 

So yes I saw the thread that was last year. Any more smartass comments?

 

Josh at Perfect Clones has a Quartz rep, he even has a few example QC Pics for you to check it out;

 

http://www.pf-818.com/0omsp00182-speedmaster-dark-side-moon-tgle-os20-quartz-p-16425.html

 

I'm not too sure on the whole moondust dial however

[Rolls-Man 0]

At the bottom of my post, I asked if there was a rep. The link that was given didn't mention one.

 

So yes I saw the thread that was last year. Any more smartass comments?

 

Josh at Perfect Clones has a Quartz rep, he even has a few example QC Pics for you to check it out;

 

http://www.pf-818.co...tz-p-16425.html

 

I'm not too sure on the whole moondust dial however

 

Thanks for the link

[steve123 0]

White dial doesnt do it for me.. personally. That moon dust dial sets it apart.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

starting to think not so obvious troll is not so obvious.. only way to really explain it, without insulting OP.

[black263 228]

At the bottom of my post, I asked if there was a rep. The link that was given didn't mention one.

 

So yes I saw the thread that was last year. Any more smartass comments?

 

Josh at Perfect Clones has a Quartz rep, he even has a few example QC Pics for you to check it out;

 

http://www.pf-818.co...tz-p-16425.html

 

I'm not too sure on the whole moondust dial however

 

Thanks for the link

I recall that have had this discussion before. The so-called QC pics on that site are nothing of the sort. They are called QC examples but are simply generic sales pics and not of the watch that you will actually receive. If they were, he'd have to change the pics every time he sold a watch. This designation falls into the same class as AAA, +++, and 1:1 copy, ie sales bullshit. PC is a TD for a number of reasons. Accurate website isn't one of them.

[Realism 72]

wad du fugg

[chronoss 0]

black263, that's probably why it says "QC pics **example**"

 

I prefer those any day over crappy 240x180 factory images

[Rolls-Man 0]

At the bottom of my post, I asked if there was a rep. The link that was given didn't mention one.

 

So yes I saw the thread that was last year. Any more smartass comments?

 

What did you expect?

 

This must be the sixtysquillionth thread you've started asking if there's a good rep of this/that/other.

 

Tedious at best.

 

If there is an old thread that did not answer the same question that I asked, why revive it? I start a new one. Many times in other forums you can see newer threads answering questions that older thread asked but never answered.

 

So you're the thread starting sheriff now?

 

You know what's tedious? you constantly acting like you own the damn place.

[Realism 72]

[Wriggles 12]

Someones had a humour bypass...or a lobotomy....haven't quite figured it out

[Rolls-Man 0]

Someones had a humour bypass...or a lobotomy....haven't quite figured it out

 

I have figured it out, it's all fun one or twice but not all the times.

[RUSH2112 11]

At the bottom of my post, I asked if there was a rep. The link that was given didn't mention one.

 

So yes I saw the thread that was last year. Any more smartass comments?

 

What did you expect?

 

This must be the sixtysquillionth thread you've started asking if there's a good rep of this/that/other.

 

Tedious at best.

 

If there is an old thread that did not answer the same question that I asked, why revive it? I start a new one. Many times in other forums you can see newer threads answering questions that older thread asked but never answered.

 

So you're the thread starting sheriff now?

 

You know what's tedious? you constantly acting like you own the damn place.

 

How is it that you get to post whatever you want but if he feels like replying he is wrong? If you start a thread you're asking for EVERYONE'S input. If you don't want it don't start a thread is my suggestion.

[Rolls-Man 0]

At the bottom of my post, I asked if there was a rep. The link that was given didn't mention one.

 

So yes I saw the thread that was last year. Any more smartass comments?

 

What did you expect?

 

This must be the sixtysquillionth thread you've started asking if there's a good rep of this/that/other.

 

Tedious at best.

 

If there is an old thread that did not answer the same question that I asked, why revive it? I start a new one. Many times in other forums you can see newer threads answering questions that older thread asked but never answered.

 

So you're the thread starting sheriff now?

 

You know what's tedious? you constantly acting like you own the damn place.

 

How is it that you get to post whatever you want but if he feels like replying he is wrong? If you start a thread you're asking for EVERYONE'S input. If you don't want it don't start a thread is my suggestion.

 

Get a clue, look at how pickle and some others have answered and the way they have answered to some of my threads?

 

If you still blame me for getting irritated, then you didn't get the clue.

[RUSH2112 11]

Thick skin suggestion: the guy you're trying to fight (PBR) started a thread, got told to fuck off several times, had his member title changed, had his avatar changed and it's all laughs. Relax a bit man and enjoy this place.

[UmpaHimself 222]

At the bottom of my post, I asked if there was a rep. The link that was given didn't mention one.

 

So yes I saw the thread that was last year. Any more smartass comments?

[Rolls-Man 0]

Thick skin suggestion: the guy you're trying to fight (PBR) started a thread, got told to fuck off several times, had his member title changed, had his avatar changed and it's all laughs. Relax a bit man and enjoy this place.

 

I'm getting used to it slowly..